Demographics details for New bedford, MA vs Waterloo, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New bedford, MA vs Waterloo, AL.
Data | New bedford | Waterloo |
---|---|---|
Population | 100,682 | 183 |
Median Age | 36.8 years | 59.0 years |
Median Income | $54,604 | $38,750 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: New bedford vs Waterloo
- In New bedford, the population is higher at 100,682, compared to 183 in Waterloo.
- The median age in Waterloo is higher at 59.0 years, compared to 36.8 years in New bedford.
- New bedford has a higher median income of $54,604 compared to $38,750 in Waterloo.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both New bedford and Waterloo at 29.0%.
- New bedford has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in Waterloo.
- The unemployment rate in New bedford is higher at 5.5%, compared to 3.5% in Waterloo.
Demographics
Demographics New bedford vs Waterloo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | New bedford | Waterloo |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | Data is updating |
White | 56 | 97 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 23 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 14 | 1 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: New bedford vs Waterloo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in New bedford at 5% compared to 0% in Waterloo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Waterloo at 97% compared to 56% in New bedford.
- The Asian population is larger in New bedford at 1% compared to 0% in Waterloo.
- The Hispanic community is larger in New bedford at 23% compared to 2% in Waterloo.
- More residents identify as two or more races in New bedford at 14% compared to 1% in Waterloo.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in New bedford at 1% compared to 0% in Waterloo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | New bedford | Waterloo |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 20.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 14.3% |
Depression | 24.2% | 27.6% |
Smoking | 22.3% | 23.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 15.9% |
Obesity | 33.6% | 38.8% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New bedford vs Waterloo
- In Waterloo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 19.4% in New bedford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Waterloo at 27.6% versus 24.2% in New bedford.
- Waterloo has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 22.3% in New bedford.
- Binge drinking is more common in New bedford at 16.4% compared to 15.9% in Waterloo.
- Waterloo has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 33.6% in New bedford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waterloo at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in New bedford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | New bedford | Waterloo |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (2,746) | 0.5% (1) |
High School Diploma | 19.3% (19,436) | 10.4% (19) |
Less than High School | 28.8% (29,037) | 23.0% (42) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (11,005) | 4.9% (9) |
Education Levels Comparison: New bedford vs Waterloo
- A higher percentage of residents in New bedford have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.5% in Waterloo.
- A higher percentage of residents in New bedford hold a high school diploma at 19.3% compared to 10.4% in Waterloo.
- More residents in New bedford have less than a high school education at 28.8% compared to 23.0% in Waterloo.
- A higher percentage of residents in New bedford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 4.9% in Waterloo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.