Demographics details for New bedford, MA vs Pasadena, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New bedford, MA vs Pasadena, CA.
| Data | New bedford | Pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 100,682 | 134,211 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $54,604 | $97,818 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: New bedford vs Pasadena
- The population in Pasadena is higher at 134,211, compared to 100,682 in New bedford.
- The median age in Pasadena is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 36.8 years in New bedford.
- Pasadena has a higher median income of $97,818, compared to $54,604 in New bedford.
- In Pasadena, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 29.0% in New bedford.
- New bedford has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 14% in Pasadena.
- The unemployment rate in New bedford is higher at 5.5%, compared to 5.3% in Pasadena.
Demographics
Demographics New bedford vs Pasadena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | New bedford | Pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 8 |
| White | 56 | 24 |
| Asian | 1 | 18 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 36 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: New bedford vs Pasadena
- In Pasadena, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 5% in New bedford.
- New bedford has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 24% in Pasadena.
- In Pasadena, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 1% in New bedford.
- Pasadena has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 23% in New bedford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in New bedford at 14% compared to 13% in Pasadena.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both New bedford and Pasadena at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | New bedford | Pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 15.4% |
| Smoking | 22.3% | 9.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 33.6% | 26.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New bedford vs Pasadena
- More residents in New bedford report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 14.2% in Pasadena.
- Depression is more prevalent in New bedford at 24.2% compared to 15.4% in Pasadena.
- Smoking is more prevalent in New bedford at 22.3% compared to 9.3% in Pasadena.
- Binge drinking is more common in New bedford at 16.4% compared to 15.4% in Pasadena.
- Obesity rates are higher in New bedford at 33.6% compared to 26.6% in Pasadena.
- Disability percentages are higher in New bedford at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Pasadena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | New bedford | Pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (2,746) | 1.8% (2,430) |
| High School Diploma | 19.3% (19,436) | 9.9% (13,275) |
| Less than High School | 28.8% (29,037) | 15.0% (20,140) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (11,005) | 42.2% (56,583) |
Education Levels Comparison: New bedford vs Pasadena
- A higher percentage of residents in New bedford have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.8% in Pasadena.
- A higher percentage of residents in New bedford hold a high school diploma at 19.3% compared to 9.9% in Pasadena.
- More residents in New bedford have less than a high school education at 28.8% compared to 15.0% in Pasadena.
- In Pasadena, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 10.9% in New bedford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.