Demographics details for New bedford, MA vs Fremont, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New bedford, MA vs Fremont, OH.
Data | New bedford | Fremont |
---|---|---|
Population | 100,682 | 15,825 |
Median Age | 36.8 years | 35.7 years |
Median Income | $54,604 | $48,252 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: New bedford vs Fremont
- In New bedford, the population is higher at 100,682, compared to 15,825 in Fremont.
- Residents in New bedford have a higher median age of 36.8 years compared to 35.7 years in Fremont.
- New bedford has a higher median income of $54,604 compared to $48,252 in Fremont.
- In Fremont, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 29.0% in New bedford.
- New bedford has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 14% in Fremont.
- The unemployment rate in New bedford is higher at 5.5%, compared to 4.0% in Fremont.
Demographics
Demographics New bedford vs Fremont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | New bedford | Fremont |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 9 |
White | 56 | 68 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 23 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 14 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: New bedford vs Fremont
- In Fremont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 5% in New bedford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fremont at 68% compared to 56% in New bedford.
- The Asian population is larger in New bedford at 1% compared to 0% in Fremont.
- The Hispanic community is larger in New bedford at 23% compared to 15% in Fremont.
- More residents identify as two or more races in New bedford at 14% compared to 8% in Fremont.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in New bedford at 1% compared to 0% in Fremont.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | New bedford | Fremont |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 13.2% |
Depression | 24.2% | 22.5% |
Smoking | 22.3% | 22.9% |
Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 17.4% |
Obesity | 33.6% | 44.3% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New bedford vs Fremont
- More residents in New bedford report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.0% in Fremont.
- Depression is more prevalent in New bedford at 24.2% compared to 22.5% in Fremont.
- Fremont has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 22.3% in New bedford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fremont at 17.4% compared to 16.4% in New bedford.
- Fremont has higher obesity rates at 44.3% compared to 33.6% in New bedford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fremont at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in New bedford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | New bedford | Fremont |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (2,746) | 0.4% (57) |
High School Diploma | 19.3% (19,436) | 24.8% (3,931) |
Less than High School | 28.8% (29,037) | 10.0% (1,586) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (11,005) | 10.4% (1,641) |
Education Levels Comparison: New bedford vs Fremont
- A higher percentage of residents in New bedford have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.4% in Fremont.
- In Fremont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.8% compared to 19.3% in New bedford.
- More residents in New bedford have less than a high school education at 28.8% compared to 10.0% in Fremont.
- A higher percentage of residents in New bedford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 10.4% in Fremont.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.