Demographics details for New albany, OH vs Los angeles, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in New albany, OH vs Los angeles, CA.

Data New albany Los angeles
Population 11,043 3,822,238
Median Age 40.9 years 36.5 years
Median Income $224,824 $76,244
Married Families 51.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 1% 17%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 6.0

Population Comparison: New albany vs Los angeles

  • The population in Los angeles is higher at 3,822,238, compared to 11,043 in New albany.
  • Residents in New albany have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 36.5 years in Los angeles.
  • New albany has a higher median income of $224,824 compared to $76,244 in Los angeles.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in New albany at 51.0% compared to 33.0% in Los angeles.
  • The poverty level is higher in Los angeles at 17%, compared to 1% in New albany.
  • Los angeles has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 3.2% in New albany.

Demographics

Demographics New albany vs Los angeles provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic New albany Los angeles
Black 2 9
White 72 16
Asian 8 12
Hispanic 7 49
Two or More Races 11 13
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: New albany vs Los angeles

  • In Los angeles, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 2% in New albany.
  • New albany has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 16% in Los angeles.
  • In Los angeles, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 8% in New albany.
  • Los angeles has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 7% in New albany.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Los angeles at 13%, compared to 11% in New albany.
  • In Los angeles, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in New albany.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric New albany Los angeles
Mental Health Not Good 13.6% 15.8%
Physical Health Not Good 7.3% 12.0%
Depression 22.1% 16.1%
Smoking 10.1% 11.8%
Binge Drinking 20.8% 14.9%
Obesity 28.6% 29.5%
Disability Percentage 4.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: New albany vs Los angeles

  • In Los angeles, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 13.6% in New albany.
  • Depression is more prevalent in New albany at 22.1% compared to 16.1% in Los angeles.
  • Los angeles has a higher smoking rate at 11.8% compared to 10.1% in New albany.
  • Binge drinking is more common in New albany at 20.8% compared to 14.9% in Los angeles.
  • Los angeles has higher obesity rates at 29.5% compared to 28.6% in New albany.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Los angeles at 10.0% compared to 4.0% in New albany.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level New albany Los angeles
No Schooling 0.2% (17) 3.0% (116,335)
High School Diploma 3.4% (371) 12.1% (461,986)
Less than High School 1.0% (111) 28.8% (1,101,987)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 45.6% (5,031) 26.2% (1,002,780)

Education Levels Comparison: New albany vs Los angeles

  • In Los angeles, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.2% in New albany.
  • In Los angeles, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.1% compared to 3.4% in New albany.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Los angeles at 28.8%, compared to 1.0% in New albany.
  • A higher percentage of residents in New albany hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.6% compared to 26.2% in Los angeles.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.