Demographics details for New albany, OH vs Jessup, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New albany, OH vs Jessup, MD.
| Data | New albany | Jessup |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,043 | 9,602 |
| Median Age | 40.9 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $224,824 | $140,561 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 1% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: New albany vs Jessup
- In New albany, the population is higher at 11,043, compared to 9,602 in Jessup.
- Residents in New albany have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 36.8 years in Jessup.
- New albany has a higher median income of $224,824 compared to $140,561 in Jessup.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in New albany at 51.0% compared to 24.0% in Jessup.
- The poverty level is higher in Jessup at 6%, compared to 1% in New albany.
- Jessup has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in New albany.
Demographics
Demographics New albany vs Jessup provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | New albany | Jessup |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 54 |
| White | 72 | 24 |
| Asian | 8 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: New albany vs Jessup
- In Jessup, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 54% compared to 2% in New albany.
- New albany has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 24% in Jessup.
- The Asian population is larger in New albany at 8% compared to 6% in Jessup.
- Jessup has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 7% in New albany.
- More residents identify as two or more races in New albany at 11% compared to 6% in Jessup.
- In Jessup, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in New albany.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | New albany | Jessup |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.6% | 13.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.3% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 15.4% |
| Smoking | 10.1% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.8% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 28.6% | 39.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 2.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New albany vs Jessup
- In Jessup, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.7% compared to 13.6% in New albany.
- Depression is more prevalent in New albany at 22.1% compared to 15.4% in Jessup.
- Jessup has a higher smoking rate at 15.0% compared to 10.1% in New albany.
- Binge drinking is more common in New albany at 20.8% compared to 16.8% in Jessup.
- Jessup has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 28.6% in New albany.
- Disability percentages are higher in New albany at 4.0% compared to 2.0% in Jessup.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | New albany | Jessup |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (17) | 1.5% (143) |
| High School Diploma | 3.4% (371) | 15.1% (1,453) |
| Less than High School | 1.0% (111) | 24.7% (2,373) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 45.6% (5,031) | 18.3% (1,760) |
Education Levels Comparison: New albany vs Jessup
- In Jessup, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.2% in New albany.
- In Jessup, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.1% compared to 3.4% in New albany.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jessup at 24.7%, compared to 1.0% in New albany.
- A higher percentage of residents in New albany hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.6% compared to 18.3% in Jessup.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.