Demographics details for New albany, OH vs Hospers, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New albany, OH vs Hospers, IA.
| Data | New albany | Hospers |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,043 | 710 |
| Median Age | 40.9 years | 29.8 years |
| Median Income | $224,824 | $69,659 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 57.0% |
| Poverty Level | 1% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: New albany vs Hospers
- In New albany, the population is higher at 11,043, compared to 710 in Hospers.
- Residents in New albany have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 29.8 years in Hospers.
- New albany has a higher median income of $224,824 compared to $69,659 in Hospers.
- In Hospers, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 51.0% in New albany.
- The poverty level is higher in Hospers at 6%, compared to 1% in New albany.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both New albany and Hospers at 3.2%.
Demographics
Demographics New albany vs Hospers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | New albany | Hospers |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 72 | 70 |
| Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 26 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: New albany vs Hospers
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in New albany at 2% compared to 0% in Hospers.
- New albany has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 70% in Hospers.
- The Asian population is larger in New albany at 8% compared to 0% in Hospers.
- Hospers has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 7% in New albany.
- More residents identify as two or more races in New albany at 11% compared to 3% in Hospers.
- In Hospers, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in New albany.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | New albany | Hospers |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.6% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.3% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 16.6% |
| Smoking | 10.1% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.8% | 21.6% |
| Obesity | 28.6% | 38.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New albany vs Hospers
- In Hospers, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 13.6% in New albany.
- Depression is more prevalent in New albany at 22.1% compared to 16.6% in Hospers.
- Hospers has a higher smoking rate at 15.2% compared to 10.1% in New albany.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hospers at 21.6% compared to 20.8% in New albany.
- Hospers has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 28.6% in New albany.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hospers at 14.0% compared to 4.0% in New albany.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | New albany | Hospers |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (17) | 0.3% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 3.4% (371) | 26.6% (189) |
| Less than High School | 1.0% (111) | 14.4% (102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 45.6% (5,031) | 11.3% (80) |
Education Levels Comparison: New albany vs Hospers
- In Hospers, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in New albany.
- In Hospers, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.6% compared to 3.4% in New albany.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hospers at 14.4%, compared to 1.0% in New albany.
- A higher percentage of residents in New albany hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.6% compared to 11.3% in Hospers.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.