Demographics details for Nevada, MO vs Warner robins, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Nevada, MO vs Warner robins, GA.
| Data | Nevada | Warner robins |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,205 | 82,175 |
| Median Age | 38.4 years | 32.4 years |
| Median Income | $44,318 | $63,678 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Nevada vs Warner robins
- The population in Warner robins is higher at 82,175, compared to 8,205 in Nevada.
- Residents in Nevada have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 32.4 years in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has a higher median income of $63,678, compared to $44,318 in Nevada.
- In Warner robins, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 28.0% in Nevada.
- Nevada has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 8% in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.4% in Nevada.
Demographics
Demographics Nevada vs Warner robins provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Nevada | Warner robins |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 40 |
| White | 90 | 42 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Nevada vs Warner robins
- In Warner robins, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 1% in Nevada.
- Nevada has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 42% in Warner robins.
- In Warner robins, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Nevada.
- Warner robins has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 4% in Nevada.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Warner robins at 7%, compared to 5% in Nevada.
- In Warner robins, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Nevada.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Nevada | Warner robins |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.7% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 26.7% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 26.3% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Nevada vs Warner robins
- More residents in Nevada report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 17.6% in Warner robins.
- Depression is more prevalent in Nevada at 26.7% compared to 22.1% in Warner robins.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Nevada at 26.3% compared to 18.6% in Warner robins.
- Binge drinking is more common in Nevada at 16.1% compared to 15.9% in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 38.5% in Nevada.
- Disability percentages are higher in Nevada at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Warner robins.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Nevada | Warner robins |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (89) | 0.4% (335) |
| High School Diploma | 20.8% (1,706) | 14.9% (12,260) |
| Less than High School | 14.1% (1,155) | 7.0% (5,714) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.8% (972) | 19.2% (15,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Nevada vs Warner robins
- A higher percentage of residents in Nevada have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Warner robins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Nevada hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 14.9% in Warner robins.
- More residents in Nevada have less than a high school education at 14.1% compared to 7.0% in Warner robins.
- In Warner robins, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 11.8% in Nevada.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.