Demographics details for Netawaka, KS vs Woodstock, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Netawaka, KS vs Woodstock, IL.
| Data | Netawaka | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 139 | 25,665 |
| Median Age | 44.7 years | 36.3 years |
| Median Income | $70,417 | $82,287 |
| Married Families | 65.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Netawaka vs Woodstock
- The population in Woodstock is higher at 25,665, compared to 139 in Netawaka.
- Residents in Netawaka have a higher median age of 44.7 years compared to 36.3 years in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $82,287, compared to $70,417 in Netawaka.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Netawaka at 65.0% compared to 40.0% in Woodstock.
- Netawaka has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 8% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 2.5% in Netawaka.
Demographics
Demographics Netawaka vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Netawaka | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 89 | 59 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 13 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Netawaka vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Netawaka.
- Netawaka has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 59% in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Netawaka.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 1% in Netawaka.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodstock at 13%, compared to 6% in Netawaka.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Netawaka at 3% compared to 0% in Woodstock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Netawaka | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 15.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 20.2% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 39.0% | 32.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Netawaka vs Woodstock
- More residents in Netawaka report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 15.3% in Woodstock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Netawaka at 22.6% compared to 20.2% in Woodstock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Netawaka at 17.6% compared to 15.2% in Woodstock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Netawaka at 19.4% compared to 17.7% in Woodstock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Netawaka at 39.0% compared to 32.4% in Woodstock.
- Disability percentages are higher in Netawaka at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Netawaka | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (2) | 0.9% (237) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (31) | 15.8% (4,047) |
| Less than High School | 3.6% (5) | 12.9% (3,314) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.8% (15) | 21.0% (5,381) |
Education Levels Comparison: Netawaka vs Woodstock
- A higher percentage of residents in Netawaka have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.9% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Netawaka hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 15.8% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodstock at 12.9%, compared to 3.6% in Netawaka.
- In Woodstock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 10.8% in Netawaka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.