Demographics details for Netawaka, KS vs Summerfield, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Netawaka, KS vs Summerfield, NC.
| Data | Netawaka | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 139 | 11,111 |
| Median Age | 44.7 years | 45.1 years |
| Median Income | $70,417 | $148,182 |
| Married Families | 65.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Netawaka vs Summerfield
- The population in Summerfield is higher at 11,111, compared to 139 in Netawaka.
- The median age in Summerfield is higher at 45.1 years, compared to 44.7 years in Netawaka.
- Summerfield has a higher median income of $148,182, compared to $70,417 in Netawaka.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Netawaka at 65.0% compared to 52.0% in Summerfield.
- Netawaka has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 7% in Summerfield.
- Summerfield has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 2.5% in Netawaka.
Demographics
Demographics Netawaka vs Summerfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Netawaka | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 89 | 82 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Netawaka vs Summerfield
- In Summerfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Netawaka.
- Netawaka has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 82% in Summerfield.
- In Summerfield, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Netawaka.
- Summerfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 1% in Netawaka.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Netawaka at 6% compared to 4% in Summerfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Netawaka at 3% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Netawaka | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 13.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 8.2% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 10.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 39.0% | 28.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Netawaka vs Summerfield
- More residents in Netawaka report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 13.0% in Summerfield.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 22.6%.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Netawaka at 17.6% compared to 10.6% in Summerfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Summerfield at 19.5% compared to 19.4% in Netawaka.
- Obesity rates are higher in Netawaka at 39.0% compared to 28.7% in Summerfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Netawaka at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Summerfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Netawaka | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (2) | 1.0% (109) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (31) | 8.8% (973) |
| Less than High School | 3.6% (5) | 6.1% (674) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.8% (15) | 38.9% (4,326) |
Education Levels Comparison: Netawaka vs Summerfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Netawaka have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.0% in Summerfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Netawaka hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 8.8% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Summerfield at 6.1%, compared to 3.6% in Netawaka.
- In Summerfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 10.8% in Netawaka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.