Demographics details for Netawaka, KS vs South jordan, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Netawaka, KS vs South jordan, UT.
| Data | Netawaka | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 139 | 83,513 |
| Median Age | 44.7 years | 34.4 years |
| Median Income | $70,417 | $119,822 |
| Married Families | 65.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Netawaka vs South jordan
- The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 139 in Netawaka.
- Residents in Netawaka have a higher median age of 44.7 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $70,417 in Netawaka.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Netawaka at 65.0% compared to 44.0% in South jordan.
- Netawaka has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 2.5% in Netawaka.
Demographics
Demographics Netawaka vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Netawaka | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 89 | 83 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 5 |
| American Indian | 3 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Netawaka vs South jordan
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Netawaka and South jordan at 0%.
- Netawaka has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 83% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Netawaka.
- South jordan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 1% in Netawaka.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Netawaka at 6% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Netawaka at 3% compared to 1% in South jordan.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Netawaka | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 7.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 39.0% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Netawaka vs South jordan
- In South jordan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 15.7% in Netawaka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 22.6% in Netawaka.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Netawaka at 17.6% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Netawaka at 19.4% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
- Obesity rates are higher in Netawaka at 39.0% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Netawaka at 19.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Netawaka | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (2) | 0.2% (172) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (31) | 8.4% (6,995) |
| Less than High School | 3.6% (5) | 2.7% (2,236) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.8% (15) | 27.1% (22,648) |
Education Levels Comparison: Netawaka vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of residents in Netawaka have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Netawaka hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
- More residents in Netawaka have less than a high school education at 3.6% compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 10.8% in Netawaka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.