Demographics details for Nesmith, SC vs Thorndale, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Nesmith, SC vs Thorndale, PA.
Data | Nesmith | Thorndale |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,626 | 4,007 |
Median Age | 42.4 years | 38.1 years |
Median Income | $39,304 | $96,667 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Nesmith vs Thorndale
- The population in Thorndale is higher at 4,007, compared to 2,626 in Nesmith.
- Residents in Nesmith have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 38.1 years in Thorndale.
- Thorndale has a higher median income of $96,667, compared to $39,304 in Nesmith.
- In Thorndale, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 42.0% in Nesmith.
- Nesmith has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 6% in Thorndale.
- The unemployment rate in Nesmith is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Thorndale.
Demographics
Demographics Nesmith vs Thorndale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Nesmith | Thorndale |
---|---|---|
Black | 42 | 7 |
White | 46 | 78 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 6 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Nesmith vs Thorndale
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Nesmith at 42% compared to 7% in Thorndale.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Thorndale at 78% compared to 46% in Nesmith.
- Both Nesmith and Thorndale have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Thorndale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 6% in Nesmith.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Thorndale at 5%, compared to 4% in Nesmith.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Nesmith and Thorndale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Nesmith | Thorndale |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 14.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 9.3% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 21.4% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 13.2% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 18.8% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 33.1% |
Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Nesmith vs Thorndale
- In Thorndale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 0.0% in Nesmith.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Thorndale at 21.4% versus 0.0% in Nesmith.
- Thorndale has a higher smoking rate at 13.2% compared to 0.0% in Nesmith.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Thorndale at 18.8% compared to 0.0% in Nesmith.
- Thorndale has higher obesity rates at 33.1% compared to 0.0% in Nesmith.
- Disability percentages are higher in Nesmith at 31.0% compared to 9.0% in Thorndale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Nesmith | Thorndale |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (14) | 0.0% (1) |
High School Diploma | 21.7% (571) | 22.3% (893) |
Less than High School | 22.1% (580) | 3.6% (146) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.6% (225) | 26.9% (1,077) |
Education Levels Comparison: Nesmith vs Thorndale
- A higher percentage of residents in Nesmith have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Thorndale.
- In Thorndale, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 21.7% in Nesmith.
- More residents in Nesmith have less than a high school education at 22.1% compared to 3.6% in Thorndale.
- In Thorndale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.9% compared to 8.6% in Nesmith.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.