Demographics details for Nesmith, SC vs South river, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Nesmith, SC vs South river, NJ.
| Data | Nesmith | South river |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,626 | 15,990 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $39,304 | $95,981 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Nesmith vs South river
- The population in South river is higher at 15,990, compared to 2,626 in Nesmith.
- Residents in Nesmith have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 37.1 years in South river.
- South river has a higher median income of $95,981, compared to $39,304 in Nesmith.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Nesmith at 42.0% compared to 39.0% in South river.
- Nesmith has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 8% in South river.
- The unemployment rate in Nesmith is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.2% in South river.
Demographics
Demographics Nesmith vs South river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Nesmith | South river |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 42 | 7 |
| White | 46 | 50 |
| Asian | 2 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Nesmith vs South river
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Nesmith at 42% compared to 7% in South river.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South river at 50% compared to 46% in Nesmith.
- In South river, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Nesmith.
- South river has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 6% in Nesmith.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South river at 7%, compared to 4% in Nesmith.
- In South river, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Nesmith.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Nesmith | South river |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 10.4% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 31.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Nesmith vs South river
- In South river, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Nesmith.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South river at 21.0% versus 0.0% in Nesmith.
- South river has a higher smoking rate at 14.6% compared to 0.0% in Nesmith.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in South river at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Nesmith.
- South river has higher obesity rates at 31.6% compared to 0.0% in Nesmith.
- Disability percentages are higher in Nesmith at 31.0% compared to 11.0% in South river.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Nesmith | South river |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (14) | 2.5% (394) |
| High School Diploma | 21.7% (571) | 18.7% (2,985) |
| Less than High School | 22.1% (580) | 20.6% (3,292) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.6% (225) | 18.9% (3,025) |
Education Levels Comparison: Nesmith vs South river
- In South river, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.5% in Nesmith.
- A higher percentage of residents in Nesmith hold a high school diploma at 21.7% compared to 18.7% in South river.
- More residents in Nesmith have less than a high school education at 22.1% compared to 20.6% in South river.
- In South river, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 8.6% in Nesmith.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.