Demographics details for Nesmith, SC vs Provo, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Nesmith, SC vs Provo, UT.
| Data | Nesmith | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,626 | 113,523 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 23.6 years |
| Median Income | $39,304 | $57,943 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Nesmith vs Provo
- The population in Provo is higher at 113,523, compared to 2,626 in Nesmith.
- Residents in Nesmith have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- Provo has a higher median income of $57,943, compared to $39,304 in Nesmith.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Nesmith at 42.0% compared to 36.0% in Provo.
- Nesmith has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 11% in Provo.
- The unemployment rate in Nesmith is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.0% in Provo.
Demographics
Demographics Nesmith vs Provo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Nesmith | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 42 | 1 |
| White | 46 | 69 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Nesmith vs Provo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Nesmith at 42% compared to 1% in Provo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Provo at 69% compared to 46% in Nesmith.
- Both Nesmith and Provo have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Provo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 6% in Nesmith.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Provo at 9%, compared to 4% in Nesmith.
- In Provo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Nesmith.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Nesmith | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 12.0% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 8.4% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 7.3% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Nesmith vs Provo
- In Provo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Nesmith.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Provo at 24.5% versus 0.0% in Nesmith.
- Provo has a higher smoking rate at 8.4% compared to 0.0% in Nesmith.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Provo at 7.3% compared to 0.0% in Nesmith.
- Provo has higher obesity rates at 33.5% compared to 0.0% in Nesmith.
- Disability percentages are higher in Nesmith at 31.0% compared to 10.0% in Provo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Nesmith | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (14) | 0.6% (663) |
| High School Diploma | 21.7% (571) | 4.6% (5,209) |
| Less than High School | 22.1% (580) | 5.7% (6,435) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.6% (225) | 18.3% (20,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Nesmith vs Provo
- In Provo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Nesmith.
- A higher percentage of residents in Nesmith hold a high school diploma at 21.7% compared to 4.6% in Provo.
- More residents in Nesmith have less than a high school education at 22.1% compared to 5.7% in Provo.
- In Provo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 8.6% in Nesmith.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.