Demographics details for Navajo dam, NM vs Sylvania, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Navajo dam, NM vs Sylvania, OH.
| Data | Navajo dam | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 330 | 19,051 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 42.1 years |
| Median Income | $63,375 | $86,048 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Navajo dam vs Sylvania
- The population in Sylvania is higher at 19,051, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
- The median age in Sylvania is higher at 42.1 years, compared to 36.6 years in Navajo dam.
- Sylvania has a higher median income of $86,048, compared to $63,375 in Navajo dam.
- In Sylvania, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 34.0% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Sylvania.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Navajo dam and Sylvania at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Navajo dam vs Sylvania provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Navajo dam | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 16 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 67 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
| American Indian | 6 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Sylvania
- In Sylvania, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sylvania at 89% compared to 16% in Navajo dam.
- In Sylvania, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Navajo dam.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Navajo dam at 67% compared to 3% in Sylvania.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Navajo dam at 11% compared to 3% in Sylvania.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Navajo dam at 6% compared to 0% in Sylvania.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Navajo dam | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 32.6% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Sylvania
- In Sylvania, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 15.2% in Navajo dam.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sylvania at 22.9% versus 17.8% in Navajo dam.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Navajo dam at 15.0% compared to 13.5% in Sylvania.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sylvania at 18.1% compared to 14.1% in Navajo dam.
- Sylvania has higher obesity rates at 35.0% compared to 32.6% in Navajo dam.
- Disability percentages are higher in Navajo dam at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Sylvania.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Navajo dam | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 4.8% (16) | 12.1% (2,300) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (20) | 3.1% (587) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.7% (75) | 35.1% (6,680) |
Education Levels Comparison: Navajo dam vs Sylvania
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Navajo dam and Sylvania at 0.0%.
- In Sylvania, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.1% compared to 4.8% in Navajo dam.
- More residents in Navajo dam have less than a high school education at 6.1% compared to 3.1% in Sylvania.
- In Sylvania, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.1% compared to 22.7% in Navajo dam.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.