Demographics details for Navajo dam, NM vs Spring valley, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Navajo dam, NM vs Spring valley, NY.

Data Navajo dam Spring valley
Population 330 32,884
Median Age 36.6 years 27.5 years
Median Income $63,375 $50,749
Married Families 34.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 14% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Navajo dam vs Spring valley

  • The population in Spring valley is higher at 32,884, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
  • Residents in Navajo dam have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 27.5 years in Spring valley.
  • Navajo dam has a higher median income of $63,375 compared to $50,749 in Spring valley.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Navajo dam at 34.0% compared to 32.0% in Spring valley.
  • Navajo dam has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Spring valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Navajo dam is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Spring valley.

Demographics

Demographics Navajo dam vs Spring valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Navajo dam Spring valley
Black Data is updating 32
White 16 31
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 67 29
Two or More Races 11 5
American Indian 6 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Spring valley

  • In Spring valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 32% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Spring valley at 31% compared to 16% in Navajo dam.
  • In Spring valley, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Navajo dam.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Navajo dam at 67% compared to 29% in Spring valley.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Navajo dam at 11% compared to 5% in Spring valley.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Navajo dam at 6% compared to 0% in Spring valley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Navajo dam Spring valley
Mental Health Not Good 15.2% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 11.2% 13.9%
Depression 17.8% 18.7%
Smoking 15.0% 22.3%
Binge Drinking 14.1% 12.6%
Obesity 32.6% 34.3%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Spring valley

  • In Spring valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 15.2% in Navajo dam.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Spring valley at 18.7% versus 17.8% in Navajo dam.
  • Spring valley has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 15.0% in Navajo dam.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Navajo dam at 14.1% compared to 12.6% in Spring valley.
  • Spring valley has higher obesity rates at 34.3% compared to 32.6% in Navajo dam.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Navajo dam at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Spring valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Navajo dam Spring valley
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 3.7% (1,224)
High School Diploma 4.8% (16) 13.1% (4,315)
Less than High School 6.1% (20) 20.5% (6,742)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.7% (75) 10.0% (3,273)

Education Levels Comparison: Navajo dam vs Spring valley

  • In Spring valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.0% in Navajo dam.
  • In Spring valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.1% compared to 4.8% in Navajo dam.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Spring valley at 20.5%, compared to 6.1% in Navajo dam.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Navajo dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 10.0% in Spring valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.