Demographics details for Navajo dam, NM vs Phillipsburg, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Navajo dam, NM vs Phillipsburg, OH.
| Data | Navajo dam | Phillipsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 330 | 496 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $63,375 | $56,250 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Navajo dam vs Phillipsburg
- The population in Phillipsburg is higher at 496, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
- Residents in Navajo dam have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 33.6 years in Phillipsburg.
- Navajo dam has a higher median income of $63,375 compared to $56,250 in Phillipsburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Navajo dam at 34.0% compared to 31.0% in Phillipsburg.
- Navajo dam has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 8% in Phillipsburg.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Navajo dam and Phillipsburg at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Navajo dam vs Phillipsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Navajo dam | Phillipsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 16 | 96 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 67 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 6 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Phillipsburg
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Navajo dam and Phillipsburg at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Phillipsburg at 96% compared to 16% in Navajo dam.
- Both Navajo dam and Phillipsburg have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Navajo dam at 67% compared to 4% in Phillipsburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Navajo dam at 11% compared to 0% in Phillipsburg.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Navajo dam at 6% compared to 0% in Phillipsburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Navajo dam | Phillipsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 19.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | 32.6% | 38.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Phillipsburg
- In Phillipsburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.2% in Navajo dam.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Phillipsburg at 26.6% versus 17.8% in Navajo dam.
- Phillipsburg has a higher smoking rate at 19.1% compared to 15.0% in Navajo dam.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Phillipsburg at 19.6% compared to 14.1% in Navajo dam.
- Phillipsburg has higher obesity rates at 38.2% compared to 32.6% in Navajo dam.
- Disability percentages are higher in Navajo dam at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Phillipsburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Navajo dam | Phillipsburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 4.8% (16) | 16.9% (84) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (20) | 10.1% (50) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.7% (75) | 9.1% (45) |
Education Levels Comparison: Navajo dam vs Phillipsburg
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Navajo dam and Phillipsburg at 0.0%.
- In Phillipsburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 4.8% in Navajo dam.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Phillipsburg at 10.1%, compared to 6.1% in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Navajo dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 9.1% in Phillipsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.