Demographics details for Navajo dam, NM vs Louisburg, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Navajo dam, NM vs Louisburg, NC.
| Data | Navajo dam | Louisburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 330 | 3,215 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 28.9 years |
| Median Income | $63,375 | $41,813 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Navajo dam vs Louisburg
- The population in Louisburg is higher at 3,215, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
- Residents in Navajo dam have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 28.9 years in Louisburg.
- Navajo dam has a higher median income of $63,375 compared to $41,813 in Louisburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Navajo dam at 34.0% compared to 17.0% in Louisburg.
- Navajo dam has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 13% in Louisburg.
- Louisburg has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Navajo dam.
Demographics
Demographics Navajo dam vs Louisburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Navajo dam | Louisburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 53 |
| White | 16 | 39 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 67 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
| American Indian | 6 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Louisburg
- In Louisburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 53% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Louisburg at 39% compared to 16% in Navajo dam.
- In Louisburg, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Navajo dam.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Navajo dam at 67% compared to 3% in Louisburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Navajo dam at 11% compared to 3% in Louisburg.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Navajo dam at 6% compared to 0% in Louisburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Navajo dam | Louisburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 17.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 12.8% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 32.6% | 39.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Louisburg
- In Louisburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 15.2% in Navajo dam.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Louisburg at 22.3% versus 17.8% in Navajo dam.
- Louisburg has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 15.0% in Navajo dam.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Louisburg at 15.8% compared to 14.1% in Navajo dam.
- Louisburg has higher obesity rates at 39.0% compared to 32.6% in Navajo dam.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Louisburg at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Navajo dam.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Navajo dam | Louisburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.1% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 4.8% (16) | 14.2% (458) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (20) | 11.0% (353) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.7% (75) | 9.3% (300) |
Education Levels Comparison: Navajo dam vs Louisburg
- In Louisburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Navajo dam.
- In Louisburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.2% compared to 4.8% in Navajo dam.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Louisburg at 11.0%, compared to 6.1% in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Navajo dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 9.3% in Louisburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.