Demographics details for Navajo dam, NM vs Jasper, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Navajo dam, NM vs Jasper, AL.
| Data | Navajo dam | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 330 | 14,338 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $63,375 | $62,850 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Navajo dam vs Jasper
- The population in Jasper is higher at 14,338, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
- Residents in Navajo dam have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 35.4 years in Jasper.
- Navajo dam has a higher median income of $63,375 compared to $62,850 in Jasper.
- In Jasper, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 34.0% in Navajo dam.
- The poverty level is higher in Jasper at 15%, compared to 14% in Navajo dam.
- Jasper has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Navajo dam.
Demographics
Demographics Navajo dam vs Jasper provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Navajo dam | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 10 |
| White | 16 | 81 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 67 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 4 |
| American Indian | 6 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Jasper
- In Jasper, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Jasper at 81% compared to 16% in Navajo dam.
- Both Navajo dam and Jasper have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Navajo dam at 67% compared to 5% in Jasper.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Navajo dam at 11% compared to 4% in Jasper.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Navajo dam at 6% compared to 0% in Jasper.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Navajo dam | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 32.6% | 38.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Jasper
- In Jasper, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 15.2% in Navajo dam.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Jasper at 24.0% versus 17.8% in Navajo dam.
- Jasper has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 15.0% in Navajo dam.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Jasper at 15.1% compared to 14.1% in Navajo dam.
- Jasper has higher obesity rates at 38.2% compared to 32.6% in Navajo dam.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jasper at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Navajo dam.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Navajo dam | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (69) |
| High School Diploma | 4.8% (16) | 14.6% (2,098) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (20) | 12.9% (1,856) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.7% (75) | 16.3% (2,338) |
Education Levels Comparison: Navajo dam vs Jasper
- In Jasper, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Navajo dam.
- In Jasper, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.6% compared to 4.8% in Navajo dam.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jasper at 12.9%, compared to 6.1% in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Navajo dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 16.3% in Jasper.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.