Demographics details for Navajo dam, NM vs Irvine, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Navajo dam, NM vs Irvine, CA.
| Data | Navajo dam | Irvine |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 330 | 313,685 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 33.8 years |
| Median Income | $63,375 | $122,948 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Navajo dam vs Irvine
- The population in Irvine is higher at 313,685, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
- Residents in Navajo dam have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 33.8 years in Irvine.
- Irvine has a higher median income of $122,948, compared to $63,375 in Navajo dam.
- In Irvine, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 34.0% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 6% in Irvine.
- Irvine has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Navajo dam.
Demographics
Demographics Navajo dam vs Irvine provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Navajo dam | Irvine |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 16 | 34 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 43 |
| Hispanic | 67 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 10 |
| American Indian | 6 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Irvine
- In Irvine, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Irvine at 34% compared to 16% in Navajo dam.
- In Irvine, the Asian population stands at 43%, greater than 0% in Navajo dam.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Navajo dam at 67% compared to 11% in Irvine.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Navajo dam at 11% compared to 10% in Irvine.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Navajo dam at 6% compared to 0% in Irvine.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Navajo dam | Irvine |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 7.7% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 15.4% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 7.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 32.6% | 21.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Irvine
- More residents in Navajo dam report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 12.7% in Irvine.
- Depression is more prevalent in Navajo dam at 17.8% compared to 15.4% in Irvine.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Navajo dam at 15.0% compared to 7.5% in Irvine.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Irvine at 14.9% compared to 14.1% in Navajo dam.
- Obesity rates are higher in Navajo dam at 32.6% compared to 21.0% in Irvine.
- Disability percentages are higher in Navajo dam at 14.0% compared to 5.0% in Irvine.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Navajo dam | Irvine |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (2,579) |
| High School Diploma | 4.8% (16) | 3.8% (12,010) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (20) | 3.4% (10,664) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.7% (75) | 44.3% (138,926) |
Education Levels Comparison: Navajo dam vs Irvine
- In Irvine, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Navajo dam hold a high school diploma at 4.8% compared to 3.8% in Irvine.
- More residents in Navajo dam have less than a high school education at 6.1% compared to 3.4% in Irvine.
- In Irvine, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.3% compared to 22.7% in Navajo dam.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.