Demographics details for Navajo dam, NM vs Helena, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Navajo dam, NM vs Helena, MT.
| Data | Navajo dam | Helena |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 330 | 33,885 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $63,375 | $64,798 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Navajo dam vs Helena
- The population in Helena is higher at 33,885, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
- The median age in Helena is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 36.6 years in Navajo dam.
- Helena has a higher median income of $64,798, compared to $63,375 in Navajo dam.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Navajo dam and Helena at 34.0%.
- Navajo dam has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Helena.
- The unemployment rate in Navajo dam is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.0% in Helena.
Demographics
Demographics Navajo dam vs Helena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Navajo dam | Helena |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 16 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 67 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 4 |
| American Indian | 6 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Helena
- In Helena, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Helena at 88% compared to 16% in Navajo dam.
- In Helena, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Navajo dam.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Navajo dam at 67% compared to 5% in Helena.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Navajo dam at 11% compared to 4% in Helena.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Navajo dam at 6% compared to 1% in Helena.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Navajo dam | Helena |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 13.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 21.9% |
| Obesity | 32.6% | 30.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Helena
- More residents in Navajo dam report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 14.8% in Helena.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Helena at 23.5% versus 17.8% in Navajo dam.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Navajo dam at 15.0% compared to 13.1% in Helena.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Helena at 21.9% compared to 14.1% in Navajo dam.
- Obesity rates are higher in Navajo dam at 32.6% compared to 30.4% in Helena.
- Disability percentages are higher in Navajo dam at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Helena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Navajo dam | Helena |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.1% (38) |
| High School Diploma | 4.8% (16) | 10.0% (3,385) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (20) | 4.7% (1,597) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.7% (75) | 34.3% (11,632) |
Education Levels Comparison: Navajo dam vs Helena
- In Helena, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Navajo dam.
- In Helena, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.0% compared to 4.8% in Navajo dam.
- More residents in Navajo dam have less than a high school education at 6.1% compared to 4.7% in Helena.
- In Helena, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.3% compared to 22.7% in Navajo dam.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.