Demographics details for Navajo dam, NM vs Georgetown, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Navajo dam, NM vs Georgetown, IN.

Data Navajo dam Georgetown
Population 330 4,497
Median Age 36.6 years 42.0 years
Median Income $63,375 $65,000
Married Families 34.0% 65.0%
Poverty Level 14% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.0

Population Comparison: Navajo dam vs Georgetown

  • The population in Georgetown is higher at 4,497, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
  • The median age in Georgetown is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 36.6 years in Navajo dam.
  • Georgetown has a higher median income of $65,000, compared to $63,375 in Navajo dam.
  • In Georgetown, the percentage of married families is higher at 65.0%, compared to 34.0% in Navajo dam.
  • Navajo dam has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Georgetown.
  • The unemployment rate in Navajo dam is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.0% in Georgetown.

Demographics

Demographics Navajo dam vs Georgetown provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Navajo dam Georgetown
Black Data is updating 5
White 16 90
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 67 2
Two or More Races 11 1
American Indian 6 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Georgetown

  • In Georgetown, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Georgetown at 90% compared to 16% in Navajo dam.
  • In Georgetown, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Navajo dam.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Navajo dam at 67% compared to 2% in Georgetown.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Navajo dam at 11% compared to 1% in Georgetown.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Navajo dam at 6% compared to 0% in Georgetown.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Navajo dam Georgetown
Mental Health Not Good 15.2% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 11.2% Data is updating%
Depression 17.8% Data is updating%
Smoking 15.0% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 14.1% Data is updating%
Obesity 32.6% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 14.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Georgetown

  • More residents in Navajo dam report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Navajo dam at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Navajo dam at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Navajo dam at 14.1% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Navajo dam at 32.6% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Navajo dam at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Navajo dam Georgetown
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 4.8% (16) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 6.1% (20) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.7% (75) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Navajo dam vs Georgetown

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Navajo dam and Georgetown at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Navajo dam hold a high school diploma at 4.8% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
  • More residents in Navajo dam have less than a high school education at 6.1% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Navajo dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.