Demographics details for Navajo dam, NM vs Crosbyton, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Navajo dam, NM vs Crosbyton, TX.
| Data | Navajo dam | Crosbyton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 330 | 1,461 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 39.1 years |
| Median Income | $63,375 | $47,083 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Navajo dam vs Crosbyton
- The population in Crosbyton is higher at 1,461, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
- The median age in Crosbyton is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 36.6 years in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher median income of $63,375 compared to $47,083 in Crosbyton.
- In Crosbyton, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 34.0% in Navajo dam.
- The poverty level is higher in Crosbyton at 22%, compared to 14% in Navajo dam.
- The unemployment rate in Navajo dam is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Crosbyton.
Demographics
Demographics Navajo dam vs Crosbyton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Navajo dam | Crosbyton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 16 | 6 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 67 | 75 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 16 |
| American Indian | 6 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Crosbyton
- In Crosbyton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher percentage of White residents at 16% compared to 6% in Crosbyton.
- Both Navajo dam and Crosbyton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Crosbyton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 67% in Navajo dam.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Crosbyton at 16%, compared to 11% in Navajo dam.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Navajo dam at 6% compared to 0% in Crosbyton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Navajo dam | Crosbyton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 15.6% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 20.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 32.6% | 42.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Crosbyton
- In Crosbyton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.2% in Navajo dam.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Crosbyton at 23.6% versus 17.8% in Navajo dam.
- Crosbyton has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 15.0% in Navajo dam.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Crosbyton at 15.4% compared to 14.1% in Navajo dam.
- Crosbyton has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 32.6% in Navajo dam.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crosbyton at 26.0% compared to 14.0% in Navajo dam.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Navajo dam | Crosbyton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.1% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 4.8% (16) | 24.6% (359) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (20) | 37.1% (542) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.7% (75) | 8.8% (129) |
Education Levels Comparison: Navajo dam vs Crosbyton
- In Crosbyton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Navajo dam.
- In Crosbyton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.6% compared to 4.8% in Navajo dam.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crosbyton at 37.1%, compared to 6.1% in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Navajo dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 8.8% in Crosbyton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.