Demographics details for Navajo dam, NM vs Chino, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Navajo dam, NM vs Chino, CA.
| Data | Navajo dam | Chino |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 330 | 93,140 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 36.9 years |
| Median Income | $63,375 | $99,385 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Navajo dam vs Chino
- The population in Chino is higher at 93,140, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
- The median age in Chino is higher at 36.9 years, compared to 36.6 years in Navajo dam.
- Chino has a higher median income of $99,385, compared to $63,375 in Navajo dam.
- In Chino, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 34.0% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in Chino.
- Chino has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.5% in Navajo dam.
Demographics
Demographics Navajo dam vs Chino provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Navajo dam | Chino |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 7 |
| White | 16 | 4 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 18 |
| Hispanic | 67 | 53 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 17 |
| American Indian | 6 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Chino
- In Chino, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher percentage of White residents at 16% compared to 4% in Chino.
- In Chino, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 0% in Navajo dam.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Navajo dam at 67% compared to 53% in Chino.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chino at 17%, compared to 11% in Navajo dam.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Navajo dam at 6% compared to 1% in Chino.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Navajo dam | Chino |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 16.7% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 11.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 32.6% | 35.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Chino
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Navajo dam and Chino at 15.2%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Navajo dam at 17.8% compared to 16.7% in Chino.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Navajo dam at 15.0% compared to 11.3% in Chino.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chino at 16.0% compared to 14.1% in Navajo dam.
- Chino has higher obesity rates at 35.6% compared to 32.6% in Navajo dam.
- Disability percentages are higher in Navajo dam at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Chino.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Navajo dam | Chino |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.6% (1,483) |
| High School Diploma | 4.8% (16) | 13.2% (12,268) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (20) | 20.1% (18,697) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.7% (75) | 18.9% (17,626) |
Education Levels Comparison: Navajo dam vs Chino
- In Chino, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Navajo dam.
- In Chino, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.2% compared to 4.8% in Navajo dam.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chino at 20.1%, compared to 6.1% in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Navajo dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 18.9% in Chino.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.