Demographics details for Navajo dam, NM vs Chester, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Navajo dam, NM vs Chester, VA.
| Data | Navajo dam | Chester |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 330 | 23,068 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $63,375 | $87,242 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Navajo dam vs Chester
- The population in Chester is higher at 23,068, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
- The median age in Chester is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 36.6 years in Navajo dam.
- Chester has a higher median income of $87,242, compared to $63,375 in Navajo dam.
- In Chester, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 34.0% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Chester.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Navajo dam and Chester at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Navajo dam vs Chester provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Navajo dam | Chester |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 25 |
| White | 16 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 67 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 6 |
| American Indian | 6 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Chester
- In Chester, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chester at 55% compared to 16% in Navajo dam.
- In Chester, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Navajo dam.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Navajo dam at 67% compared to 11% in Chester.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Navajo dam at 11% compared to 6% in Chester.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Navajo dam at 6% compared to 1% in Chester.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Navajo dam | Chester |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 15.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 32.6% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Chester
- In Chester, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.2% in Navajo dam.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chester at 21.3% versus 17.8% in Navajo dam.
- Chester has a higher smoking rate at 15.3% compared to 15.0% in Navajo dam.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chester at 18.4% compared to 14.1% in Navajo dam.
- Chester has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 32.6% in Navajo dam.
- Disability percentages are higher in Navajo dam at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Chester.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Navajo dam | Chester |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.5% (344) |
| High School Diploma | 4.8% (16) | 16.8% (3,871) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (20) | 11.9% (2,738) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.7% (75) | 22.3% (5,134) |
Education Levels Comparison: Navajo dam vs Chester
- In Chester, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Navajo dam.
- In Chester, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.8% compared to 4.8% in Navajo dam.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chester at 11.9%, compared to 6.1% in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Navajo dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 22.3% in Chester.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.