Demographics details for Navajo dam, NM vs Baltic, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Navajo dam, NM vs Baltic, SD.
| Data | Navajo dam | Baltic |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 330 | 1,322 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 30.1 years |
| Median Income | $63,375 | $94,167 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Navajo dam vs Baltic
- The population in Baltic is higher at 1,322, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
- Residents in Navajo dam have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 30.1 years in Baltic.
- Baltic has a higher median income of $94,167, compared to $63,375 in Navajo dam.
- In Baltic, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 34.0% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 0% in Baltic.
- The unemployment rate in Navajo dam is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.5% in Baltic.
Demographics
Demographics Navajo dam vs Baltic provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Navajo dam | Baltic |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 16 | 92 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 67 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
| American Indian | 6 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Baltic
- In Baltic, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Baltic at 92% compared to 16% in Navajo dam.
- Both Navajo dam and Baltic have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Navajo dam at 67% compared to 1% in Baltic.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Navajo dam at 11% compared to 5% in Baltic.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Navajo dam at 6% compared to 1% in Baltic.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Navajo dam | Baltic |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 8.1% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 23.1% |
| Obesity | 32.6% | 34.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Navajo dam vs Baltic
- More residents in Navajo dam report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 13.1% in Baltic.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Baltic at 19.9% versus 17.8% in Navajo dam.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Navajo dam and Baltic at 15.0%.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Baltic at 23.1% compared to 14.1% in Navajo dam.
- Baltic has higher obesity rates at 34.5% compared to 32.6% in Navajo dam.
- Disability percentages are higher in Navajo dam at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Baltic.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Navajo dam | Baltic |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 4.8% (16) | 15.1% (199) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (20) | 3.6% (48) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.7% (75) | 19.1% (252) |
Education Levels Comparison: Navajo dam vs Baltic
- In Baltic, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Navajo dam.
- In Baltic, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.1% compared to 4.8% in Navajo dam.
- More residents in Navajo dam have less than a high school education at 6.1% compared to 3.6% in Baltic.
- A higher percentage of residents in Navajo dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 19.1% in Baltic.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.