Demographics details for Nashville, IL vs Klamath falls, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Nashville, IL vs Klamath falls, OR.

Data Nashville Klamath falls
Population 3,046 21,977
Median Age 43.9 years 35.1 years
Median Income $65,719 $46,695
Married Families 37.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 9% 18%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 5.2

Population Comparison: Nashville vs Klamath falls

  • The population in Klamath falls is higher at 21,977, compared to 3,046 in Nashville.
  • Residents in Nashville have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 35.1 years in Klamath falls.
  • Nashville has a higher median income of $65,719 compared to $46,695 in Klamath falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Nashville at 37.0% compared to 31.0% in Klamath falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Klamath falls at 18%, compared to 9% in Nashville.
  • Klamath falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 5.0% in Nashville.

Demographics

Demographics Nashville vs Klamath falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Nashville Klamath falls
Black 1 1
White 98 69
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 15
Two or More Races 1 11
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Nashville vs Klamath falls

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Nashville and Klamath falls at 1%.
  • Nashville has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 69% in Klamath falls.
  • In Klamath falls, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Nashville.
  • Klamath falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 0% in Nashville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Klamath falls at 11%, compared to 1% in Nashville.
  • In Klamath falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Nashville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Nashville Klamath falls
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% 20.2%
Physical Health Not Good 10.3% 13.4%
Depression 21.7% 28.4%
Smoking 16.2% 19.9%
Binge Drinking 18.7% 15.8%
Obesity 35.3% 35.9%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Nashville vs Klamath falls

  • In Klamath falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 15.8% in Nashville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Klamath falls at 28.4% versus 21.7% in Nashville.
  • Klamath falls has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 16.2% in Nashville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Nashville at 18.7% compared to 15.8% in Klamath falls.
  • Klamath falls has higher obesity rates at 35.9% compared to 35.3% in Nashville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Klamath falls at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Nashville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Nashville Klamath falls
No Schooling 0.7% (21) 0.9% (192)
High School Diploma 22.5% (685) 16.0% (3,508)
Less than High School 11.1% (339) 15.5% (3,401)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.9% (393) 14.4% (3,175)

Education Levels Comparison: Nashville vs Klamath falls

  • In Klamath falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Nashville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Nashville hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 16.0% in Klamath falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Klamath falls at 15.5%, compared to 11.1% in Nashville.
  • In Klamath falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 12.9% in Nashville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.