Demographics details for Muskego, WI vs Sterling heights, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Muskego, WI vs Sterling heights, MI.

Data Muskego Sterling heights
Population 25,150 132,567
Median Age 46.1 years 41.2 years
Median Income $112,537 $75,381
Married Families 53.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 4% 8%
Unemployment Rate 2.7 4.7

Population Comparison: Muskego vs Sterling heights

  • The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 25,150 in Muskego.
  • Residents in Muskego have a higher median age of 46.1 years compared to 41.2 years in Sterling heights.
  • Muskego has a higher median income of $112,537 compared to $75,381 in Sterling heights.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Muskego at 53.0% compared to 45.0% in Sterling heights.
  • The poverty level is higher in Sterling heights at 8%, compared to 4% in Muskego.
  • Sterling heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 2.7% in Muskego.

Demographics

Demographics Muskego vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Muskego Sterling heights
Black 1 6
White 91 79
Asian 1 9
Hispanic 4 2
Two or More Races 3 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Muskego vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Muskego.
  • Muskego has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 79% in Sterling heights.
  • In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 1% in Muskego.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Muskego at 4% compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sterling heights at 4%, compared to 3% in Muskego.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Muskego and Sterling heights at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Muskego Sterling heights
Mental Health Not Good 13.0% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 7.9% 11.4%
Depression 20.6% 25.5%
Smoking 12.2% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 25.7% 17.7%
Obesity 33.9% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Muskego vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 13.0% in Muskego.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling heights at 25.5% versus 20.6% in Muskego.
  • Sterling heights has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 12.2% in Muskego.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Muskego at 25.7% compared to 17.7% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 33.9% in Muskego.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sterling heights at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Muskego.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Muskego Sterling heights
No Schooling 0.2% (53) 2.4% (3,134)
High School Diploma 16.0% (4,034) 18.8% (24,937)
Less than High School 4.8% (1,215) 16.6% (22,008)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 30.3% (7,621) 22.3% (29,518)

Education Levels Comparison: Muskego vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.2% in Muskego.
  • In Sterling heights, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 16.0% in Muskego.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling heights at 16.6%, compared to 4.8% in Muskego.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Muskego hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.3% compared to 22.3% in Sterling heights.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.