Demographics details for Murrysville, PA vs Latah, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Murrysville, PA vs Latah, WA.
| Data | Murrysville | Latah |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,724 | 176 |
| Median Age | 50.1 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $117,067 | $46,563 |
| Married Families | 56.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Murrysville vs Latah
- In Murrysville, the population is higher at 20,724, compared to 176 in Latah.
- Residents in Murrysville have a higher median age of 50.1 years compared to 40.0 years in Latah.
- Murrysville has a higher median income of $117,067 compared to $46,563 in Latah.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Murrysville at 56.0% compared to 23.0% in Latah.
- Murrysville has a higher poverty level at 4% compared to 0% in Latah.
- Latah has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Murrysville.
Demographics
Demographics Murrysville vs Latah provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Murrysville | Latah |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 90 | 89 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Murrysville vs Latah
- In Latah, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Murrysville.
- Murrysville has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 89% in Latah.
- The Asian population is larger in Murrysville at 4% compared to 0% in Latah.
- Latah has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Murrysville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Latah at 5%, compared to 3% in Murrysville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Murrysville and Latah at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Murrysville | Latah |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 19.6% | 29.5% |
| Smoking | 11.1% | 15.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 28.1% | 30.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 38.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Murrysville vs Latah
- In Latah, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 13.8% in Murrysville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Latah at 29.5% versus 19.6% in Murrysville.
- Latah has a higher smoking rate at 15.3% compared to 11.1% in Murrysville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Murrysville at 20.4% compared to 18.0% in Latah.
- Latah has higher obesity rates at 30.2% compared to 28.1% in Murrysville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Latah at 38.0% compared to 10.0% in Murrysville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Murrysville | Latah |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.1% (2,929) | 26.7% (47) |
| Less than High School | 2.9% (600) | 0.6% (1) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.6% (8,613) | 11.9% (21) |
Education Levels Comparison: Murrysville vs Latah
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Murrysville and Latah at 0.0%.
- In Latah, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.7% compared to 14.1% in Murrysville.
- More residents in Murrysville have less than a high school education at 2.9% compared to 0.6% in Latah.
- A higher percentage of residents in Murrysville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.6% compared to 11.9% in Latah.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.