Demographics details for Murrysville, PA vs Cambridge, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Murrysville, PA vs Cambridge, OH.
Data | Murrysville | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,724 | 9,985 |
Median Age | 50.1 years | 35.1 years |
Median Income | $117,067 | $39,589 |
Married Families | 56.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Murrysville vs Cambridge
- In Murrysville, the population is higher at 20,724, compared to 9,985 in Cambridge.
- Residents in Murrysville have a higher median age of 50.1 years compared to 35.1 years in Cambridge.
- Murrysville has a higher median income of $117,067 compared to $39,589 in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Murrysville at 56.0% compared to 28.0% in Cambridge.
- The poverty level is higher in Cambridge at 16%, compared to 4% in Murrysville.
- Cambridge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Murrysville.
Demographics
Demographics Murrysville vs Cambridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Murrysville | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 6 |
White | 90 | 88 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Murrysville vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Murrysville.
- Murrysville has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 88% in Cambridge.
- The Asian population is larger in Murrysville at 4% compared to 0% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Murrysville and Cambridge at 2%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cambridge at 4%, compared to 3% in Murrysville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Murrysville and Cambridge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Murrysville | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 20.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 15.1% |
Depression | 19.6% | 25.9% |
Smoking | 11.1% | 26.2% |
Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 28.1% | 46.4% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Murrysville vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 13.8% in Murrysville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cambridge at 25.9% versus 19.6% in Murrysville.
- Cambridge has a higher smoking rate at 26.2% compared to 11.1% in Murrysville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Murrysville at 20.4% compared to 16.9% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has higher obesity rates at 46.4% compared to 28.1% in Murrysville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cambridge at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Murrysville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Murrysville | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (73) |
High School Diploma | 14.1% (2,929) | 25.1% (2,502) |
Less than High School | 2.9% (600) | 17.3% (1,732) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.6% (8,613) | 8.8% (875) |
Education Levels Comparison: Murrysville vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Murrysville.
- In Cambridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 14.1% in Murrysville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cambridge at 17.3%, compared to 2.9% in Murrysville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Murrysville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.6% compared to 8.8% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.