Demographics details for Murrieta, CA vs Fairfield bay, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Murrieta, CA vs Fairfield bay, AR.
| Data | Murrieta | Fairfield bay |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 113,783 | 2,152 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 68.2 years |
| Median Income | $106,925 | $58,750 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Murrieta vs Fairfield bay
- In Murrieta, the population is higher at 113,783, compared to 2,152 in Fairfield bay.
- The median age in Fairfield bay is higher at 68.2 years, compared to 35.6 years in Murrieta.
- Murrieta has a higher median income of $106,925 compared to $58,750 in Fairfield bay.
- In Fairfield bay, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 41.0% in Murrieta.
- Murrieta has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Fairfield bay.
- The unemployment rate in Murrieta is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.5% in Fairfield bay.
Demographics
Demographics Murrieta vs Fairfield bay provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Murrieta | Fairfield bay |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 1 |
| White | 38 | 86 |
| Asian | 8 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 34 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Murrieta vs Fairfield bay
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Murrieta at 5% compared to 1% in Fairfield bay.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairfield bay at 86% compared to 38% in Murrieta.
- The Asian population is larger in Murrieta at 8% compared to 1% in Fairfield bay.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Murrieta at 34% compared to 7% in Fairfield bay.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Murrieta at 15% compared to 5% in Fairfield bay.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Murrieta and Fairfield bay at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Murrieta | Fairfield bay |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 17.3% | 27.1% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 20.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 32.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Murrieta vs Fairfield bay
- In Fairfield bay, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.0% in Murrieta.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fairfield bay at 27.1% versus 17.3% in Murrieta.
- Fairfield bay has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 11.3% in Murrieta.
- Binge drinking is more common in Murrieta at 17.6% compared to 15.7% in Fairfield bay.
- Fairfield bay has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 32.5% in Murrieta.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairfield bay at 32.0% compared to 10.0% in Murrieta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Murrieta | Fairfield bay |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (1,387) | 0.2% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 11.8% (13,439) | 24.6% (529) |
| Less than High School | 8.4% (9,580) | 7.0% (151) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.6% (21,123) | 33.9% (729) |
Education Levels Comparison: Murrieta vs Fairfield bay
- A higher percentage of residents in Murrieta have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.2% in Fairfield bay.
- In Fairfield bay, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.6% compared to 11.8% in Murrieta.
- More residents in Murrieta have less than a high school education at 8.4% compared to 7.0% in Fairfield bay.
- In Fairfield bay, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.9% compared to 18.6% in Murrieta.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.