Demographics details for Murrieta, CA vs Confluence, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Murrieta, CA vs Confluence, PA.
| Data | Murrieta | Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 113,783 | 714 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 54.8 years |
| Median Income | $106,925 | $54,432 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Murrieta vs Confluence
- In Murrieta, the population is higher at 113,783, compared to 714 in Confluence.
- The median age in Confluence is higher at 54.8 years, compared to 35.6 years in Murrieta.
- Murrieta has a higher median income of $106,925 compared to $54,432 in Confluence.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Murrieta at 41.0% compared to 35.0% in Confluence.
- The poverty level is higher in Confluence at 10%, compared to 9% in Murrieta.
- Confluence has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.3% in Murrieta.
Demographics
Demographics Murrieta vs Confluence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Murrieta | Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | 38 | 92 |
| Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 34 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Murrieta vs Confluence
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Murrieta at 5% compared to 2% in Confluence.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Confluence at 92% compared to 38% in Murrieta.
- The Asian population is larger in Murrieta at 8% compared to 0% in Confluence.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Murrieta at 34% compared to 1% in Confluence.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Murrieta at 15% compared to 5% in Confluence.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Murrieta and Confluence at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Murrieta | Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 17.3% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 22.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Murrieta vs Confluence
- In Confluence, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 15.0% in Murrieta.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Confluence at 24.3% versus 17.3% in Murrieta.
- Confluence has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 11.3% in Murrieta.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Confluence at 18.7% compared to 17.6% in Murrieta.
- Confluence has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 32.5% in Murrieta.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Confluence at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Murrieta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Murrieta | Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (1,387) | 0.3% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 11.8% (13,439) | 30.3% (216) |
| Less than High School | 8.4% (9,580) | 8.0% (57) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.6% (21,123) | 11.5% (82) |
Education Levels Comparison: Murrieta vs Confluence
- A higher percentage of residents in Murrieta have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Confluence.
- In Confluence, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.3% compared to 11.8% in Murrieta.
- More residents in Murrieta have less than a high school education at 8.4% compared to 8.0% in Confluence.
- A higher percentage of residents in Murrieta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 11.5% in Confluence.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.