Demographics details for Murrieta, CA vs Columbus, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Murrieta, CA vs Columbus, MS.
| Data | Murrieta | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 113,783 | 23,273 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 38.5 years |
| Median Income | $106,925 | $38,954 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Murrieta vs Columbus
- In Murrieta, the population is higher at 113,783, compared to 23,273 in Columbus.
- The median age in Columbus is higher at 38.5 years, compared to 35.6 years in Murrieta.
- Murrieta has a higher median income of $106,925 compared to $38,954 in Columbus.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Murrieta at 41.0% compared to 25.0% in Columbus.
- The poverty level is higher in Columbus at 19%, compared to 9% in Murrieta.
- The unemployment rate in Murrieta is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.8% in Columbus.
Demographics
Demographics Murrieta vs Columbus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Murrieta | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 66 |
| White | 38 | 28 |
| Asian | 8 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 34 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Murrieta vs Columbus
- In Columbus, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 5% in Murrieta.
- Murrieta has a higher percentage of White residents at 38% compared to 28% in Columbus.
- The Asian population is larger in Murrieta at 8% compared to 2% in Columbus.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Murrieta at 34% compared to 2% in Columbus.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Murrieta at 15% compared to 2% in Columbus.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Murrieta and Columbus at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Murrieta | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 17.3% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 21.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 11.8% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 44.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Murrieta vs Columbus
- In Columbus, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 15.0% in Murrieta.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Columbus at 20.0% versus 17.3% in Murrieta.
- Columbus has a higher smoking rate at 21.0% compared to 11.3% in Murrieta.
- Binge drinking is more common in Murrieta at 17.6% compared to 11.8% in Columbus.
- Columbus has higher obesity rates at 44.8% compared to 32.5% in Murrieta.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Columbus at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Murrieta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Murrieta | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (1,387) | 1.1% (260) |
| High School Diploma | 11.8% (13,439) | 18.4% (4,272) |
| Less than High School | 8.4% (9,580) | 11.0% (2,559) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.6% (21,123) | 17.1% (3,971) |
Education Levels Comparison: Murrieta vs Columbus
- A higher percentage of residents in Murrieta have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.1% in Columbus.
- In Columbus, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 11.8% in Murrieta.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Columbus at 11.0%, compared to 8.4% in Murrieta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Murrieta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 17.1% in Columbus.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.