Demographics details for Murfreesboro, TN vs Oakley, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Murfreesboro, TN vs Oakley, CA.
| Data | Murfreesboro | Oakley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 162,398 | 44,688 |
| Median Age | 31.5 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $70,451 | $120,915 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Murfreesboro vs Oakley
- In Murfreesboro, the population is higher at 162,398, compared to 44,688 in Oakley.
- The median age in Oakley is higher at 35.8 years, compared to 31.5 years in Murfreesboro.
- Oakley has a higher median income of $120,915, compared to $70,451 in Murfreesboro.
- In Oakley, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 34.0% in Murfreesboro.
- Murfreesboro has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in Oakley.
- Oakley has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 3.0% in Murfreesboro.
Demographics
Demographics Murfreesboro vs Oakley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Murfreesboro | Oakley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 8 |
| White | 66 | 38 |
| Asian | 3 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 31 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Murfreesboro vs Oakley
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Murfreesboro at 17% compared to 8% in Oakley.
- Murfreesboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 38% in Oakley.
- In Oakley, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 3% in Murfreesboro.
- Oakley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 31%, compared to 7% in Murfreesboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oakley at 14%, compared to 7% in Murfreesboro.
- In Oakley, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Murfreesboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Murfreesboro | Oakley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 26.5% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 12.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 27.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Murfreesboro vs Oakley
- More residents in Murfreesboro report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 15.8% in Oakley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Murfreesboro at 26.5% compared to 18.5% in Oakley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Murfreesboro at 18.3% compared to 12.0% in Oakley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Oakley at 17.5% compared to 15.5% in Murfreesboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Murfreesboro at 34.8% compared to 27.3% in Oakley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Oakley at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Murfreesboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Murfreesboro | Oakley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (920) | 0.8% (374) |
| High School Diploma | 10.7% (17,362) | 15.8% (7,057) |
| Less than High School | 6.2% (10,101) | 12.8% (5,710) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (38,019) | 14.4% (6,428) |
Education Levels Comparison: Murfreesboro vs Oakley
- In Oakley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Murfreesboro.
- In Oakley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.8% compared to 10.7% in Murfreesboro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Oakley at 12.8%, compared to 6.2% in Murfreesboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Murfreesboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 14.4% in Oakley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.