Demographics details for Murfreesboro, TN vs Helotes, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Murfreesboro, TN vs Helotes, TX.
Data | Murfreesboro | Helotes |
---|---|---|
Population | 162,398 | 9,597 |
Median Age | 31.5 years | 44.6 years |
Median Income | $70,451 | $124,367 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 4% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Murfreesboro vs Helotes
- In Murfreesboro, the population is higher at 162,398, compared to 9,597 in Helotes.
- The median age in Helotes is higher at 44.6 years, compared to 31.5 years in Murfreesboro.
- Helotes has a higher median income of $124,367, compared to $70,451 in Murfreesboro.
- In Helotes, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 34.0% in Murfreesboro.
- Murfreesboro has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 4% in Helotes.
- Helotes has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.0% in Murfreesboro.
Demographics
Demographics Murfreesboro vs Helotes provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Murfreesboro | Helotes |
---|---|---|
Black | 17 | 3 |
White | 66 | 28 |
Asian | 3 | 3 |
Hispanic | 7 | 49 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 16 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Murfreesboro vs Helotes
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Murfreesboro at 17% compared to 3% in Helotes.
- Murfreesboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 28% in Helotes.
- Both Murfreesboro and Helotes have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
- Helotes has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 7% in Murfreesboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Helotes at 16%, compared to 7% in Murfreesboro.
- In Helotes, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Murfreesboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Murfreesboro | Helotes |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 8.5% |
Depression | 26.5% | 23.4% |
Smoking | 18.3% | 9.4% |
Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 19.9% |
Obesity | 34.8% | 32.2% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Murfreesboro vs Helotes
- More residents in Murfreesboro report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 14.4% in Helotes.
- Depression is more prevalent in Murfreesboro at 26.5% compared to 23.4% in Helotes.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Murfreesboro at 18.3% compared to 9.4% in Helotes.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Helotes at 19.9% compared to 15.5% in Murfreesboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Murfreesboro at 34.8% compared to 32.2% in Helotes.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Helotes at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Murfreesboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Murfreesboro | Helotes |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (920) | 1.3% (128) |
High School Diploma | 10.7% (17,362) | 7.9% (757) |
Less than High School | 6.2% (10,101) | 4.9% (472) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (38,019) | 33.2% (3,190) |
Education Levels Comparison: Murfreesboro vs Helotes
- In Helotes, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.6% in Murfreesboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Murfreesboro hold a high school diploma at 10.7% compared to 7.9% in Helotes.
- More residents in Murfreesboro have less than a high school education at 6.2% compared to 4.9% in Helotes.
- In Helotes, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.2% compared to 23.4% in Murfreesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.