Environment details: Murfreesboro TN
water quality is decent but could use a boost.
Environment details: Golden city MO
Below average; improvements necessary.
Compare Environment: Murfreesboro TN vs Golden city MO
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Murfreesboro | Golden city |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 741 | 936 |
| Water Quality | 5/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | water quality is decent but could use a boost. | Below average; improvements necessary. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.64 | 1.65 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 33 | 18 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Murfreesboro vs Golden city
- Water quality is rated higher in Murfreesboro at 5/10 compared to 4/10 in Golden city.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Golden city with an average index of 1.65 compared to 1.64 in Murfreesboro.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Murfreesboro at 33 compared to 18 in Golden city.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.