Demographics details for Murfreesboro, TN vs Falls church, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Murfreesboro, TN vs Falls church, VA.

Data Murfreesboro Falls church
Population 162,398 14,586
Median Age 31.5 years 38.8 years
Median Income $70,451 $164,536
Married Families 34.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 10% 6%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 2.5

Population Comparison: Murfreesboro vs Falls church

  • In Murfreesboro, the population is higher at 162,398, compared to 14,586 in Falls church.
  • The median age in Falls church is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 31.5 years in Murfreesboro.
  • Falls church has a higher median income of $164,536, compared to $70,451 in Murfreesboro.
  • In Falls church, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 34.0% in Murfreesboro.
  • Murfreesboro has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Falls church.
  • The unemployment rate in Murfreesboro is higher at 3.0%, compared to 2.5% in Falls church.

Demographics

Demographics Murfreesboro vs Falls church provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Murfreesboro Falls church
Black 17 5
White 66 65
Asian 3 9
Hispanic 7 11
Two or More Races 7 10
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Murfreesboro vs Falls church

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Murfreesboro at 17% compared to 5% in Falls church.
  • Murfreesboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 65% in Falls church.
  • In Falls church, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 3% in Murfreesboro.
  • Falls church has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 7% in Murfreesboro.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Falls church at 10%, compared to 7% in Murfreesboro.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Murfreesboro and Falls church at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Murfreesboro Falls church
Mental Health Not Good 18.1% 11.9%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% 6.5%
Depression 26.5% 19.9%
Smoking 18.3% 7.5%
Binge Drinking 15.5% 18.8%
Obesity 34.8% 30.8%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Murfreesboro vs Falls church

  • More residents in Murfreesboro report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 11.9% in Falls church.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Murfreesboro at 26.5% compared to 19.9% in Falls church.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Murfreesboro at 18.3% compared to 7.5% in Falls church.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Falls church at 18.8% compared to 15.5% in Murfreesboro.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Murfreesboro at 34.8% compared to 30.8% in Falls church.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Murfreesboro at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Falls church.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Murfreesboro Falls church
No Schooling 0.6% (920) 0.3% (50)
High School Diploma 10.7% (17,362) 4.1% (597)
Less than High School 6.2% (10,101) 2.7% (388)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 23.4% (38,019) 52.5% (7,660)

Education Levels Comparison: Murfreesboro vs Falls church

  • A higher percentage of residents in Murfreesboro have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Falls church.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Murfreesboro hold a high school diploma at 10.7% compared to 4.1% in Falls church.
  • More residents in Murfreesboro have less than a high school education at 6.2% compared to 2.7% in Falls church.
  • In Falls church, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.5% compared to 23.4% in Murfreesboro.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.