Demographics details for Murfreesboro, TN vs Carlisle, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Murfreesboro, TN vs Carlisle, IN.
Data | Murfreesboro | Carlisle |
---|---|---|
Population | 162,398 | 618 |
Median Age | 31.5 years | 52.6 years |
Median Income | $70,451 | $49,250 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Murfreesboro vs Carlisle
- In Murfreesboro, the population is higher at 162,398, compared to 618 in Carlisle.
- The median age in Carlisle is higher at 52.6 years, compared to 31.5 years in Murfreesboro.
- Murfreesboro has a higher median income of $70,451 compared to $49,250 in Carlisle.
- In Carlisle, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 34.0% in Murfreesboro.
- Murfreesboro has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Carlisle.
- Carlisle has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.0% in Murfreesboro.
Demographics
Demographics Murfreesboro vs Carlisle provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Murfreesboro | Carlisle |
---|---|---|
Black | 17 | 2 |
White | 66 | 93 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Murfreesboro vs Carlisle
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Murfreesboro at 17% compared to 2% in Carlisle.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Carlisle at 93% compared to 66% in Murfreesboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Murfreesboro at 3% compared to 0% in Carlisle.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Murfreesboro at 7% compared to 0% in Carlisle.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Murfreesboro at 7% compared to 5% in Carlisle.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Murfreesboro and Carlisle at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Murfreesboro | Carlisle |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 13.5% |
Depression | 26.5% | 27.0% |
Smoking | 18.3% | 24.1% |
Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 34.8% | 37.0% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Murfreesboro vs Carlisle
- In Carlisle, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.1% in Murfreesboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carlisle at 27.0% versus 26.5% in Murfreesboro.
- Carlisle has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 18.3% in Murfreesboro.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Carlisle at 16.7% compared to 15.5% in Murfreesboro.
- Carlisle has higher obesity rates at 37.0% compared to 34.8% in Murfreesboro.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carlisle at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Murfreesboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Murfreesboro | Carlisle |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (920) | 0.5% (3) |
High School Diploma | 10.7% (17,362) | 28.8% (178) |
Less than High School | 6.2% (10,101) | 3.9% (24) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (38,019) | 6.0% (37) |
Education Levels Comparison: Murfreesboro vs Carlisle
- A higher percentage of residents in Murfreesboro have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Carlisle.
- In Carlisle, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.8% compared to 10.7% in Murfreesboro.
- More residents in Murfreesboro have less than a high school education at 6.2% compared to 3.9% in Carlisle.
- A higher percentage of residents in Murfreesboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 6.0% in Carlisle.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.