Demographics details for Mullica hill, NJ vs Union springs, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mullica hill, NJ vs Union springs, AL.
Data | Mullica hill | Union springs |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,454 | 3,242 |
Median Age | 41.0 years | 28.1 years |
Median Income | $123,265 | $24,921 |
Married Families | 46.0% | 17.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 25% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Mullica hill vs Union springs
- In Mullica hill, the population is higher at 4,454, compared to 3,242 in Union springs.
- Residents in Mullica hill have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
- Mullica hill has a higher median income of $123,265 compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mullica hill at 46.0% compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
- The poverty level is higher in Union springs at 25%, compared to 4% in Mullica hill.
- Union springs has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.2% in Mullica hill.
Demographics
Demographics Mullica hill vs Union springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mullica hill | Union springs |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 69 |
White | 74 | 4 |
Asian | 4 | 1 |
Hispanic | 4 | 22 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mullica hill vs Union springs
- In Union springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 69% compared to 11% in Mullica hill.
- Mullica hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 4% in Union springs.
- The Asian population is larger in Mullica hill at 4% compared to 1% in Union springs.
- Union springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 4% in Mullica hill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mullica hill at 7% compared to 4% in Union springs.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mullica hill and Union springs at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mullica hill | Union springs |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | 21.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 16.9% |
Depression | 20.9% | 20.8% |
Smoking | 10.3% | 25.5% |
Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 11.1% |
Obesity | 27.7% | 49.5% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mullica hill vs Union springs
- In Union springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 13.7% in Mullica hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mullica hill at 20.9% compared to 20.8% in Union springs.
- Union springs has a higher smoking rate at 25.5% compared to 10.3% in Mullica hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mullica hill at 20.0% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
- Union springs has higher obesity rates at 49.5% compared to 27.7% in Mullica hill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union springs at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Mullica hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mullica hill | Union springs |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (33) | 3.6% (117) |
High School Diploma | 12.9% (576) | 15.1% (489) |
Less than High School | 5.5% (244) | 33.7% (1,092) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.2% (1,612) | 7.3% (237) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mullica hill vs Union springs
- In Union springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.7% in Mullica hill.
- In Union springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.1% compared to 12.9% in Mullica hill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Union springs at 33.7%, compared to 5.5% in Mullica hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mullica hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.2% compared to 7.3% in Union springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.