Demographics details for Mullica hill, NJ vs Oakland, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mullica hill, NJ vs Oakland, CA.
Data | Mullica hill | Oakland |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,454 | 430,553 |
Median Age | 41.0 years | 37.5 years |
Median Income | $123,265 | $94,389 |
Married Families | 46.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Mullica hill vs Oakland
- The population in Oakland is higher at 430,553, compared to 4,454 in Mullica hill.
- Residents in Mullica hill have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 37.5 years in Oakland.
- Mullica hill has a higher median income of $123,265 compared to $94,389 in Oakland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mullica hill at 46.0% compared to 34.0% in Oakland.
- The poverty level is higher in Oakland at 13%, compared to 4% in Mullica hill.
- Oakland has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.2% in Mullica hill.
Demographics
Demographics Mullica hill vs Oakland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mullica hill | Oakland |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 22 |
White | 74 | 24 |
Asian | 4 | 16 |
Hispanic | 4 | 27 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mullica hill vs Oakland
- In Oakland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 11% in Mullica hill.
- Mullica hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 24% in Oakland.
- In Oakland, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 4% in Mullica hill.
- Oakland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 4% in Mullica hill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oakland at 10%, compared to 7% in Mullica hill.
- In Oakland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mullica hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mullica hill | Oakland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | 16.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 10.8% |
Depression | 20.9% | 17.8% |
Smoking | 10.3% | 12.0% |
Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 14.7% |
Obesity | 27.7% | 30.5% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mullica hill vs Oakland
- In Oakland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 13.7% in Mullica hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mullica hill at 20.9% compared to 17.8% in Oakland.
- Oakland has a higher smoking rate at 12.0% compared to 10.3% in Mullica hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mullica hill at 20.0% compared to 14.7% in Oakland.
- Oakland has higher obesity rates at 30.5% compared to 27.7% in Mullica hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mullica hill at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Oakland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mullica hill | Oakland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (33) | 3.1% (13,479) |
High School Diploma | 12.9% (576) | 10.9% (46,896) |
Less than High School | 5.5% (244) | 17.1% (73,435) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.2% (1,612) | 36.3% (156,333) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mullica hill vs Oakland
- In Oakland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.7% in Mullica hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mullica hill hold a high school diploma at 12.9% compared to 10.9% in Oakland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Oakland at 17.1%, compared to 5.5% in Mullica hill.
- In Oakland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.3% compared to 36.2% in Mullica hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.