Demographics details for Mullica hill, NJ vs Mayo, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mullica hill, NJ vs Mayo, FL.
| Data | Mullica hill | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,454 | 1,075 |
| Median Age | 41.0 years | 30.8 years |
| Median Income | $123,265 | $40,511 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Mullica hill vs Mayo
- In Mullica hill, the population is higher at 4,454, compared to 1,075 in Mayo.
- Residents in Mullica hill have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 30.8 years in Mayo.
- Mullica hill has a higher median income of $123,265 compared to $40,511 in Mayo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mullica hill at 46.0% compared to 31.0% in Mayo.
- The poverty level is higher in Mayo at 12%, compared to 4% in Mullica hill.
- Mayo has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Mullica hill.
Demographics
Demographics Mullica hill vs Mayo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mullica hill | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 63 |
| White | 74 | 9 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mullica hill vs Mayo
- In Mayo, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 63% compared to 11% in Mullica hill.
- Mullica hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 9% in Mayo.
- The Asian population is larger in Mullica hill at 4% compared to 0% in Mayo.
- Mayo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 4% in Mullica hill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mayo at 9%, compared to 7% in Mullica hill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mullica hill and Mayo at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mullica hill | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 10.3% | 23.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 27.7% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mullica hill vs Mayo
- In Mayo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 13.7% in Mullica hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mullica hill at 20.9% compared to 20.4% in Mayo.
- Mayo has a higher smoking rate at 23.7% compared to 10.3% in Mullica hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mullica hill at 20.0% compared to 15.4% in Mayo.
- Mayo has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 27.7% in Mullica hill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mayo at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Mullica hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mullica hill | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (33) | 8.1% (87) |
| High School Diploma | 12.9% (576) | 29.1% (313) |
| Less than High School | 5.5% (244) | 20.7% (223) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.2% (1,612) | 9.2% (99) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mullica hill vs Mayo
- In Mayo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 8.1% compared to 0.7% in Mullica hill.
- In Mayo, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.1% compared to 12.9% in Mullica hill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mayo at 20.7%, compared to 5.5% in Mullica hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mullica hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.2% compared to 9.2% in Mayo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.