Demographics details for Mullica hill, NJ vs Hopkins, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mullica hill, NJ vs Hopkins, SC.
| Data | Mullica hill | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,454 | 1,738 |
| Median Age | 41.0 years | 53.9 years |
| Median Income | $123,265 | $57,262 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Mullica hill vs Hopkins
- In Mullica hill, the population is higher at 4,454, compared to 1,738 in Hopkins.
- The median age in Hopkins is higher at 53.9 years, compared to 41.0 years in Mullica hill.
- Mullica hill has a higher median income of $123,265 compared to $57,262 in Hopkins.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mullica hill at 46.0% compared to 25.0% in Hopkins.
- Mullica hill has a higher poverty level at 4% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- Hopkins has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Mullica hill.
Demographics
Demographics Mullica hill vs Hopkins provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mullica hill | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 83 |
| White | 74 | 16 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mullica hill vs Hopkins
- In Hopkins, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 83% compared to 11% in Mullica hill.
- Mullica hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 16% in Hopkins.
- The Asian population is larger in Mullica hill at 4% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mullica hill at 4% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mullica hill at 7% compared to 1% in Hopkins.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mullica hill and Hopkins at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mullica hill | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 18.8% |
| Smoking | 10.3% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 27.7% | 44.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 34.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mullica hill vs Hopkins
- In Hopkins, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 13.7% in Mullica hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mullica hill at 20.9% compared to 18.8% in Hopkins.
- Hopkins has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 10.3% in Mullica hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mullica hill at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Hopkins.
- Hopkins has higher obesity rates at 44.2% compared to 27.7% in Mullica hill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hopkins at 34.0% compared to 12.0% in Mullica hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mullica hill | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (33) | 0.1% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 12.9% (576) | 20.8% (362) |
| Less than High School | 5.5% (244) | 11.3% (197) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.2% (1,612) | 16.2% (281) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mullica hill vs Hopkins
- A higher percentage of residents in Mullica hill have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in Hopkins.
- In Hopkins, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 12.9% in Mullica hill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hopkins at 11.3%, compared to 5.5% in Mullica hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mullica hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.2% compared to 16.2% in Hopkins.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.