Demographics details for Mullica hill, NJ vs Carson, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mullica hill, NJ vs Carson, CA.
| Data | Mullica hill | Carson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,454 | 92,388 |
| Median Age | 41.0 years | 41.3 years |
| Median Income | $123,265 | $103,045 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Mullica hill vs Carson
- The population in Carson is higher at 92,388, compared to 4,454 in Mullica hill.
- The median age in Carson is higher at 41.3 years, compared to 41.0 years in Mullica hill.
- Mullica hill has a higher median income of $123,265 compared to $103,045 in Carson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mullica hill at 46.0% compared to 38.0% in Carson.
- The poverty level is higher in Carson at 15%, compared to 4% in Mullica hill.
- Carson has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 3.2% in Mullica hill.
Demographics
Demographics Mullica hill vs Carson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mullica hill | Carson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 23 |
| White | 74 | -5 |
| Asian | 4 | 26 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 41 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mullica hill vs Carson
- In Carson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 11% in Mullica hill.
- Mullica hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to -5% in Carson.
- In Carson, the Asian population stands at 26%, greater than 4% in Mullica hill.
- Carson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 41%, compared to 4% in Mullica hill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carson at 14%, compared to 7% in Mullica hill.
- In Carson, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mullica hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mullica hill | Carson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 13.4% |
| Smoking | 10.3% | 10.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 27.7% | 27.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mullica hill vs Carson
- In Carson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 13.7% in Mullica hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mullica hill at 20.9% compared to 13.4% in Carson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mullica hill at 10.3% compared to 10.2% in Carson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mullica hill at 20.0% compared to 13.9% in Carson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mullica hill at 27.7% compared to 27.4% in Carson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carson at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Mullica hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mullica hill | Carson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (33) | 3.3% (3,018) |
| High School Diploma | 12.9% (576) | 14.3% (13,240) |
| Less than High School | 5.5% (244) | 22.9% (21,161) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.2% (1,612) | 21.6% (19,977) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mullica hill vs Carson
- In Carson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 0.7% in Mullica hill.
- In Carson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.3% compared to 12.9% in Mullica hill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carson at 22.9%, compared to 5.5% in Mullica hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mullica hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.2% compared to 21.6% in Carson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.