Demographics details for Mukwonago, WI vs Topsfield, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mukwonago, WI vs Topsfield, MA.
| Data | Mukwonago | Topsfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,446 | 2,799 |
| Median Age | 39.7 years | 39.8 years |
| Median Income | $91,827 | $156,250 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Mukwonago vs Topsfield
- In Mukwonago, the population is higher at 8,446, compared to 2,799 in Topsfield.
- The median age in Topsfield is higher at 39.8 years, compared to 39.7 years in Mukwonago.
- Topsfield has a higher median income of $156,250, compared to $91,827 in Mukwonago.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mukwonago at 44.0% compared to 42.0% in Topsfield.
- Mukwonago has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Topsfield.
- The unemployment rate in Mukwonago is higher at 3.4%, compared to 2.9% in Topsfield.
Demographics
Demographics Mukwonago vs Topsfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mukwonago | Topsfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 82 | 74 |
| Asian | 4 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mukwonago vs Topsfield
- In Topsfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Mukwonago.
- Mukwonago has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 74% in Topsfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Mukwonago at 4% compared to 3% in Topsfield.
- Topsfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 7% in Mukwonago.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Topsfield at 13%, compared to 7% in Mukwonago.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mukwonago and Topsfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mukwonago | Topsfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 7.1% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 13.8% | 9.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 25.2% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 35.3% | 26.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mukwonago vs Topsfield
- In Topsfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 13.8% in Mukwonago.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Topsfield at 22.3% versus 21.2% in Mukwonago.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mukwonago at 13.8% compared to 9.0% in Topsfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mukwonago at 25.2% compared to 19.4% in Topsfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mukwonago at 35.3% compared to 26.1% in Topsfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mukwonago at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Topsfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mukwonago | Topsfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (48) | 0.7% (19) |
| High School Diploma | 17.0% (1,435) | 6.4% (179) |
| Less than High School | 4.7% (394) | 4.9% (138) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.3% (2,138) | 44.6% (1,249) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mukwonago vs Topsfield
- In Topsfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Mukwonago.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mukwonago hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 6.4% in Topsfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Topsfield at 4.9%, compared to 4.7% in Mukwonago.
- In Topsfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.6% compared to 25.3% in Mukwonago.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.