Demographics details for Mukwonago, WI vs Chino, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mukwonago, WI vs Chino, CA.
Data | Mukwonago | Chino |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,446 | 93,140 |
Median Age | 39.7 years | 36.9 years |
Median Income | $91,827 | $99,385 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Mukwonago vs Chino
- The population in Chino is higher at 93,140, compared to 8,446 in Mukwonago.
- Residents in Mukwonago have a higher median age of 39.7 years compared to 36.9 years in Chino.
- Chino has a higher median income of $99,385, compared to $91,827 in Mukwonago.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mukwonago at 44.0% compared to 40.0% in Chino.
- The poverty level is higher in Chino at 12%, compared to 5% in Mukwonago.
- Chino has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.4% in Mukwonago.
Demographics
Demographics Mukwonago vs Chino provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mukwonago | Chino |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 7 |
White | 82 | 4 |
Asian | 4 | 18 |
Hispanic | 7 | 53 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 17 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mukwonago vs Chino
- In Chino, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 0% in Mukwonago.
- Mukwonago has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 4% in Chino.
- In Chino, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 4% in Mukwonago.
- Chino has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 53%, compared to 7% in Mukwonago.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chino at 17%, compared to 7% in Mukwonago.
- In Chino, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mukwonago.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mukwonago | Chino |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 15.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 11.1% |
Depression | 21.2% | 16.7% |
Smoking | 13.8% | 11.3% |
Binge Drinking | 25.2% | 16.0% |
Obesity | 35.3% | 35.6% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mukwonago vs Chino
- In Chino, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 13.8% in Mukwonago.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mukwonago at 21.2% compared to 16.7% in Chino.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mukwonago at 13.8% compared to 11.3% in Chino.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mukwonago at 25.2% compared to 16.0% in Chino.
- Chino has higher obesity rates at 35.6% compared to 35.3% in Mukwonago.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mukwonago at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Chino.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mukwonago | Chino |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (48) | 1.6% (1,483) |
High School Diploma | 17.0% (1,435) | 13.2% (12,268) |
Less than High School | 4.7% (394) | 20.1% (18,697) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.3% (2,138) | 18.9% (17,626) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mukwonago vs Chino
- In Chino, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.6% in Mukwonago.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mukwonago hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 13.2% in Chino.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chino at 20.1%, compared to 4.7% in Mukwonago.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mukwonago hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.3% compared to 18.9% in Chino.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.