Demographics details for Mukwonago, WI vs Centralia, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mukwonago, WI vs Centralia, IL.
Data | Mukwonago | Centralia |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,446 | 11,931 |
Median Age | 39.7 years | 40.7 years |
Median Income | $91,827 | $46,468 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Mukwonago vs Centralia
- The population in Centralia is higher at 11,931, compared to 8,446 in Mukwonago.
- The median age in Centralia is higher at 40.7 years, compared to 39.7 years in Mukwonago.
- Mukwonago has a higher median income of $91,827 compared to $46,468 in Centralia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mukwonago at 44.0% compared to 33.0% in Centralia.
- The poverty level is higher in Centralia at 12%, compared to 5% in Mukwonago.
- Centralia has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.4% in Mukwonago.
Demographics
Demographics Mukwonago vs Centralia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mukwonago | Centralia |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 10 |
White | 82 | 79 |
Asian | 4 | 2 |
Hispanic | 7 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mukwonago vs Centralia
- In Centralia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 0% in Mukwonago.
- Mukwonago has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 79% in Centralia.
- The Asian population is larger in Mukwonago at 4% compared to 2% in Centralia.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mukwonago at 7% compared to 4% in Centralia.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mukwonago at 7% compared to 5% in Centralia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mukwonago and Centralia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mukwonago | Centralia |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 19.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 13.8% |
Depression | 21.2% | 23.9% |
Smoking | 13.8% | 22.7% |
Binge Drinking | 25.2% | 16.4% |
Obesity | 35.3% | 41.1% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mukwonago vs Centralia
- In Centralia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 13.8% in Mukwonago.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Centralia at 23.9% versus 21.2% in Mukwonago.
- Centralia has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 13.8% in Mukwonago.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mukwonago at 25.2% compared to 16.4% in Centralia.
- Centralia has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 35.3% in Mukwonago.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Centralia at 22.0% compared to 10.0% in Mukwonago.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mukwonago | Centralia |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (48) | 0.6% (72) |
High School Diploma | 17.0% (1,435) | 18.8% (2,243) |
Less than High School | 4.7% (394) | 13.7% (1,638) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.3% (2,138) | 12.5% (1,494) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mukwonago vs Centralia
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Mukwonago and Centralia at 0.6%.
- In Centralia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 17.0% in Mukwonago.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Centralia at 13.7%, compared to 4.7% in Mukwonago.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mukwonago hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.3% compared to 12.5% in Centralia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.