Demographics details for Mukilteo, WA vs Warwick, RI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mukilteo, WA vs Warwick, RI.
Data | Mukilteo | Warwick |
---|---|---|
Population | 21,096 | 83,016 |
Median Age | 43.6 years | 44.5 years |
Median Income | $123,036 | $81,009 |
Married Families | 48.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Mukilteo vs Warwick
- The population in Warwick is higher at 83,016, compared to 21,096 in Mukilteo.
- The median age in Warwick is higher at 44.5 years, compared to 43.6 years in Mukilteo.
- Mukilteo has a higher median income of $123,036 compared to $81,009 in Warwick.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mukilteo at 48.0% compared to 40.0% in Warwick.
- The poverty level is higher in Warwick at 7%, compared to 5% in Mukilteo.
- Warwick has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.2% in Mukilteo.
Demographics
Demographics Mukilteo vs Warwick provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mukilteo | Warwick |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 3 |
White | 61 | 83 |
Asian | 21 | 3 |
Hispanic | 6 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mukilteo vs Warwick
- In Warwick, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Mukilteo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Warwick at 83% compared to 61% in Mukilteo.
- The Asian population is larger in Mukilteo at 21% compared to 3% in Warwick.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Mukilteo and Warwick at 6%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mukilteo at 11% compared to 5% in Warwick.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mukilteo and Warwick at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mukilteo | Warwick |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 16.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 9.6% |
Depression | 26.5% | 27.5% |
Smoking | 9.3% | 14.9% |
Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 19.2% |
Obesity | 29.2% | 29.3% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mukilteo vs Warwick
- In Warwick, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 14.6% in Mukilteo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Warwick at 27.5% versus 26.5% in Mukilteo.
- Warwick has a higher smoking rate at 14.9% compared to 9.3% in Mukilteo.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Warwick at 19.2% compared to 15.7% in Mukilteo.
- Warwick has higher obesity rates at 29.3% compared to 29.2% in Mukilteo.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Warwick at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Mukilteo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mukilteo | Warwick |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (24) | 0.5% (374) |
High School Diploma | 9.7% (2,042) | 17.1% (14,174) |
Less than High School | 2.0% (414) | 10.4% (8,656) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.3% (8,089) | 24.2% (20,074) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mukilteo vs Warwick
- In Warwick, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.1% in Mukilteo.
- In Warwick, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 9.7% in Mukilteo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Warwick at 10.4%, compared to 2.0% in Mukilteo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mukilteo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.3% compared to 24.2% in Warwick.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.