Demographics details for Mukilteo, WA vs Union city, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mukilteo, WA vs Union city, CA.
| Data | Mukilteo | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,096 | 67,039 |
| Median Age | 43.6 years | 41.3 years |
| Median Income | $123,036 | $138,013 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Mukilteo vs Union city
- The population in Union city is higher at 67,039, compared to 21,096 in Mukilteo.
- Residents in Mukilteo have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 41.3 years in Union city.
- Union city has a higher median income of $138,013, compared to $123,036 in Mukilteo.
- In Union city, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 48.0% in Mukilteo.
- The poverty level is higher in Union city at 9%, compared to 5% in Mukilteo.
- Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.2% in Mukilteo.
Demographics
Demographics Mukilteo vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mukilteo | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 5 |
| White | 61 | 6 |
| Asian | 21 | 58 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mukilteo vs Union city
- In Union city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Mukilteo.
- Mukilteo has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 6% in Union city.
- In Union city, the Asian population stands at 58%, greater than 21% in Mukilteo.
- Union city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 6% in Mukilteo.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mukilteo at 11% compared to 9% in Union city.
- In Union city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mukilteo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mukilteo | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 12.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 8.0% |
| Depression | 26.5% | 13.9% |
| Smoking | 9.3% | 8.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 29.2% | 21.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mukilteo vs Union city
- More residents in Mukilteo report poor mental health at 14.6% compared to 12.8% in Union city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mukilteo at 26.5% compared to 13.9% in Union city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mukilteo at 9.3% compared to 8.6% in Union city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mukilteo at 15.7% compared to 13.7% in Union city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mukilteo at 29.2% compared to 21.7% in Union city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mukilteo at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Union city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mukilteo | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (24) | 2.7% (1,812) |
| High School Diploma | 9.7% (2,042) | 14.2% (9,499) |
| Less than High School | 2.0% (414) | 15.3% (10,264) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.3% (8,089) | 34.7% (23,285) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mukilteo vs Union city
- In Union city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.1% in Mukilteo.
- In Union city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.2% compared to 9.7% in Mukilteo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Union city at 15.3%, compared to 2.0% in Mukilteo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mukilteo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.3% compared to 34.7% in Union city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.