Demographics details for Mukilteo, WA vs Lancaster, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mukilteo, WA vs Lancaster, PA.
| Data | Mukilteo | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,096 | 57,453 |
| Median Age | 43.6 years | 31.8 years |
| Median Income | $123,036 | $61,014 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Mukilteo vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 57,453, compared to 21,096 in Mukilteo.
- Residents in Mukilteo have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 31.8 years in Lancaster.
- Mukilteo has a higher median income of $123,036 compared to $61,014 in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mukilteo at 48.0% compared to 28.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 12%, compared to 5% in Mukilteo.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.2% in Mukilteo.
Demographics
Demographics Mukilteo vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mukilteo | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 18 |
| White | 61 | 24 |
| Asian | 21 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 40 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mukilteo vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 1% in Mukilteo.
- Mukilteo has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 24% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Mukilteo at 21% compared to 3% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 40%, compared to 6% in Mukilteo.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 15%, compared to 11% in Mukilteo.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mukilteo and Lancaster at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mukilteo | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 17.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 26.5% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 9.3% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 29.2% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mukilteo vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 14.6% in Mukilteo.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mukilteo at 26.5% compared to 21.8% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 9.3% in Mukilteo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mukilteo at 15.7% compared to 14.9% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 29.2% in Mukilteo.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lancaster at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Mukilteo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mukilteo | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (24) | 1.9% (1,077) |
| High School Diploma | 9.7% (2,042) | 16.7% (9,588) |
| Less than High School | 2.0% (414) | 18.6% (10,712) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.3% (8,089) | 17.4% (10,012) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mukilteo vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.1% in Mukilteo.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 9.7% in Mukilteo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 18.6%, compared to 2.0% in Mukilteo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mukilteo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.3% compared to 17.4% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.