Demographics details for Mukilteo, WA vs Cocoa beach, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mukilteo, WA vs Cocoa beach, FL.
Data | Mukilteo | Cocoa beach |
---|---|---|
Population | 21,096 | 11,341 |
Median Age | 43.6 years | 58.6 years |
Median Income | $123,036 | $80,880 |
Married Families | 48.0% | 50.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Mukilteo vs Cocoa beach
- In Mukilteo, the population is higher at 21,096, compared to 11,341 in Cocoa beach.
- The median age in Cocoa beach is higher at 58.6 years, compared to 43.6 years in Mukilteo.
- Mukilteo has a higher median income of $123,036 compared to $80,880 in Cocoa beach.
- In Cocoa beach, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 48.0% in Mukilteo.
- The poverty level is higher in Cocoa beach at 7%, compared to 5% in Mukilteo.
- Cocoa beach has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Mukilteo.
Demographics
Demographics Mukilteo vs Cocoa beach provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mukilteo | Cocoa beach |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 61 | 85 |
Asian | 21 | 1 |
Hispanic | 6 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mukilteo vs Cocoa beach
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Mukilteo and Cocoa beach at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cocoa beach at 85% compared to 61% in Mukilteo.
- The Asian population is larger in Mukilteo at 21% compared to 1% in Cocoa beach.
- Cocoa beach has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 6% in Mukilteo.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mukilteo at 11% compared to 6% in Cocoa beach.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mukilteo and Cocoa beach at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mukilteo | Cocoa beach |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 14.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 8.7% |
Depression | 26.5% | 19.5% |
Smoking | 9.3% | 14.5% |
Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 29.2% | 29.4% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mukilteo vs Cocoa beach
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Mukilteo and Cocoa beach at 14.6%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mukilteo at 26.5% compared to 19.5% in Cocoa beach.
- Cocoa beach has a higher smoking rate at 14.5% compared to 9.3% in Mukilteo.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cocoa beach at 17.9% compared to 15.7% in Mukilteo.
- Cocoa beach has higher obesity rates at 29.4% compared to 29.2% in Mukilteo.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cocoa beach at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Mukilteo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mukilteo | Cocoa beach |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (24) | 0.4% (48) |
High School Diploma | 9.7% (2,042) | 11.7% (1,326) |
Less than High School | 2.0% (414) | 4.7% (532) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.3% (8,089) | 43.6% (4,948) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mukilteo vs Cocoa beach
- In Cocoa beach, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.1% in Mukilteo.
- In Cocoa beach, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.7% compared to 9.7% in Mukilteo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cocoa beach at 4.7%, compared to 2.0% in Mukilteo.
- In Cocoa beach, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.6% compared to 38.3% in Mukilteo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.