Demographics details for Mukilteo, WA vs Central falls, RI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mukilteo, WA vs Central falls, RI.
Data | Mukilteo | Central falls |
---|---|---|
Population | 21,096 | 22,490 |
Median Age | 43.6 years | 31.5 years |
Median Income | $123,036 | $43,092 |
Married Families | 48.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Mukilteo vs Central falls
- The population in Central falls is higher at 22,490, compared to 21,096 in Mukilteo.
- Residents in Mukilteo have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 31.5 years in Central falls.
- Mukilteo has a higher median income of $123,036 compared to $43,092 in Central falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mukilteo at 48.0% compared to 29.0% in Central falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Central falls at 20%, compared to 5% in Mukilteo.
- Central falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 3.2% in Mukilteo.
Demographics
Demographics Mukilteo vs Central falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mukilteo | Central falls |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 8 |
White | 61 | 4 |
Asian | 21 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 6 | 69 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 18 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mukilteo vs Central falls
- In Central falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 1% in Mukilteo.
- Mukilteo has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 4% in Central falls.
- The Asian population is larger in Mukilteo at 21% compared to 0% in Central falls.
- Central falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 69%, compared to 6% in Mukilteo.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central falls at 18%, compared to 11% in Mukilteo.
- In Central falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mukilteo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mukilteo | Central falls |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 19.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 17.4% |
Depression | 26.5% | 26.7% |
Smoking | 9.3% | 22.8% |
Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 14.2% |
Obesity | 29.2% | 40.6% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mukilteo vs Central falls
- In Central falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 14.6% in Mukilteo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central falls at 26.7% versus 26.5% in Mukilteo.
- Central falls has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 9.3% in Mukilteo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mukilteo at 15.7% compared to 14.2% in Central falls.
- Central falls has higher obesity rates at 40.6% compared to 29.2% in Mukilteo.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central falls at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Mukilteo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mukilteo | Central falls |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (24) | 4.7% (1,048) |
High School Diploma | 9.7% (2,042) | 15.1% (3,406) |
Less than High School | 2.0% (414) | 44.1% (9,911) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.3% (8,089) | 5.6% (1,270) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mukilteo vs Central falls
- In Central falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 0.1% in Mukilteo.
- In Central falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.1% compared to 9.7% in Mukilteo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central falls at 44.1%, compared to 2.0% in Mukilteo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mukilteo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.3% compared to 5.6% in Central falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.